EVALUATION OF THE BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF IN VIVO USED ORTHODONTIC MINI-IMPLANTS

被引:0
|
作者
Pop, Silvia Izabella [1 ]
Dudescu, Mircea [2 ]
Ana, Procopciuc [3 ]
Kerekes-Mathe, Bernadette-Evelyn [4 ]
Mitariu, Mihai [5 ]
Bud, Eugen [6 ]
Mitariu, Loredana [7 ]
Pacurar, Mariana [8 ]
Pop, Radu Vasile [9 ]
机构
[1] George Emil Palade Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol T, Fac Med Dent, Dept Orthodont, 38 Gh Marinescu Str, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[2] Tech Univ Cluj Napoca, Dept Mech Engn, 28 Memorandumului St, Cluj Napoca 400114, Romania
[3] George Emil Palade Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol T, Dept Dent Surg, Fac Med Dent, 38 Gh Marinescu Str, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[4] George Emil Palade Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol T, Morphol Teeth & Dent Arches Dept, Fac Med Dent, 38 Gh Marinescu Str, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[5] Lucian Balga Univ, Fac Med Dent, Dept Dent Med & Nursing, Blvd Victoriei, Sibiu 550024, Romania
[6] George Emil Palade Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol T, Dept Orthodont, Fac Med Dent, 38 Gh Marinescu Str, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[7] Lucian Balga Univ, Fac Med Dent, Dept Dent Med & Nursing, Sibiu 550024, Romania
[8] George Emil Palade Univ Med Pharm Sci & Technol T, Dept Orthodont, Fac Med Dent, 38 Gh Marinescu Str, Targu Mures 540139, Romania
[9] Nat Smile Dent Clin, 76 Gh Doja Str, Targu Mures 540232, Romania
来源
关键词
Orthodontic mini-implants; Biomechanical properties; Insertion torque; STABILITY; ANCHORAGE; INSERTION; SUCCESS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.6261/RJOR.2024.1.16.20
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim of the study Orthodontic mini-implants, are devices that are temporarily attached to the jaws bones in order to improve orthodontic anchorage and to facilitate tooth movements. The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties, namely, the insertion torque of 2 types of orthodontic mini-implants used intraorally for different periods of time. The secondary objective is to compare their properties with the new, unused mini-implants of same type and to correlate the intraoral use time with changing parameters. Material and methods The present study included a total of 51 orthodontic mini-implants, from two different manufacturers, Yesanchor OrlusTM (conical) and Link MIS TM (cylindrical), both having the same dimension 1.6 x 8 mm. These two types of mini-implants were divided into GC-control group: GCY (n=5), GCM (n=5) and GI-group used intraorally, the latter was divided according to the period of intraoral use in: GIY1 <= 12 months (n=10), GIY2 >= 12 months (n=15), GIM1 <= 12 months (n=7), GIM2 >= 12 months (n=9). In order to test the insertion torque, all the samples from the GI groups (n=41) were inserted in high-density artificial bone. Results The maximum insertion torque values for Yesanchor mini-implants varied from 35.58 Ncm to 42.34 Ncm and for MIS mini-implants from 19.44 Ncm to 25.36 Ncm. Significant decrease of the intraorally used mini-implants maximum insertion torque was demonstrated both for the Yesanchor group (p<0.05) and MIS group (p<0.05). Regarding the intraorally usage time, the differences were not significant. Conclusions Our study showed that there exist differences in maximum insertion torque between the mini-implants from two different manufacturers. We observed a decrease of the maximum insertion torque for the group of mini-implants used intraorally compared to the Control Group.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of metal artifacts on in vivo micro-CT for orthodontic mini-implants
    Ejima, Ken-ichiro
    Omasa, Saori
    Motoyoshi, Mitsuru
    Arai, Yoshinori
    Kai, Yukiko
    Amemiya, Toshihiko
    Yamada, Hisaya
    Honda, Kazuya
    Shimizu, Noriyoshi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCE, 2012, 54 (01) : 55 - 59
  • [22] Mini-implants for direct or indirect orthodontic anchorageQuestion: What factors effect the use of mini-implants for direct or indirect orthodontic anchorage?
    Yijin Ren
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2009, 10 (4) : 113 - 113
  • [23] Mechanical strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implants
    Chau-Hsiang Wang
    Ju-Hui Wu
    Kun-Tsung Lee
    Kun-Rong Hsu
    Huang Chi Wang
    Chun-Ming Chen
    Odontology, 2011, 99 : 98 - 100
  • [24] Morphological and structural characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants
    AlSamak, Saeed
    Bitsanis, Elias
    Makou, Margarita
    Eliades, George
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2012, 73 (01): : 58 - 71
  • [25] Immediate loading of orthodontic mini-implants: a histomorphometric evaluation of tissue reaction
    Luzi, Cesare
    Verna, Carlalberta
    Melsen, Birte
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [26] Evaluation of the Palatal Bone for Placement of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Japanese Adults
    Nakahara, Ken
    Matsunaga, Satoru
    Abe, Shinichi
    Tamatsu, Yuichi
    Kageyama, Ikuo
    Hashimoto, Masatsugu
    Ide, Yoshinobu
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2012, 30 (01): : 72 - 79
  • [27] Design of orthodontic mini-implants contributing to implantation torque
    Katic, V.
    Spalj, S.
    Opalic, M.
    Domitran, Z.
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING II, 2014, : 29 - 33
  • [28] Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage
    Freire, Jose Nilo O.
    Silva, Nelson R. F. A.
    Gil, Jose N.
    Magini, Ricardo S.
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 131 (06) : 704.e1 - 704.e9
  • [29] A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage
    Cheng, SJ
    Tseng, IY
    Lee, JJ
    Kok, SH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2004, 19 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [30] Comparative Evaluation of Primary Stability of Two Different Types of Orthodontic Mini-Implants
    Jyotirmay, Singh
    Singh, Sanjay Kumar
    Gupta, Abhinav Raj
    Nayak, Subhash Chandra
    Vatsa, Ritesh
    Priyadarshni, Priyanka
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05): : 128 - 131