Effect of input subsidies and extension services: Evidence from rice productivity in Bangladesh

被引:3
|
作者
Hazrana, Jaweriah [1 ]
Mishra, Ashok K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Morrison Sch Agribusiness, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Control function; Panel data; Rice yield; Robustness; Heterogenous effects; AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; IMPACT; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; WELFARE; MALAWI; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102628
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This study examines the effect of agricultural input subsidy cards and extension services on Bangladesh's rice productivity, using plot level panel data from three waves (2011-2019) of the Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey. To control for endogeneity of the two programs, instrumental variable and control function approaches are used. Findings reveal that access to input subsidy cards and extension services raise productivity in riceplanted plots by nearly 20% and 22%, respectively. Further, the channels and type of advisory services matter. Finally, access to input subsidy cards and extension services is more beneficial in areas prone to droughts and excessive rainfall. These findings underscore the value of complementary investments in robust extension systems, especially in vulnerable regions, to optimize the performance of input subsidy programs. Expanded extension services coupled with input subsidies can be an effective policy mix to raise productivity, strengthen climate resilience, and promote inclusive agricultural growth in Bangladesh.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Heterogeneity in the Rebound Effect: Evidence from Efficient Lighting Subsidies
    Shojaeddini, Ensieh
    Gilbert, Ben
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2023, 84 (01): : 173 - 217
  • [32] The effect of housing loan subsidies on affordability: Evidence from Croatia
    Kunovac, Davor
    Zilic, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2022, 55
  • [33] Immigration, trade and productivity in services: Evidence from UK firms
    Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P.
    Peri, Giovanni
    Wright, Greg C.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 112 : 88 - 108
  • [34] Trade liberalization, input intermediaries and firm productivity: Evidence from China
    Defever, Fabrice
    Imbruno, Michele
    Kneller, Richard
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 126
  • [35] Exporting and productivity in business services: Evidence from the United States
    Love, James H.
    Mansury, Mica Ariana
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2009, 18 (06) : 630 - 642
  • [36] Services liberalization and productivity of manufacturing firms Evidence from Ukraine
    Shepotylo, Oleksandr
    Vakhitov, Volodymyr
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2015, 23 (01) : 1 - 44
  • [37] Firm-level heterogeneous productivity and demand shocks: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Kee, Hiau Looi
    Krishna, Kala
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (02): : 457 - 462
  • [38] Financial deregulation and productivity growth in banking sector: empirical evidence from Bangladesh
    Robin, Iftekhar
    Salim, Ruhul
    Bloch, Harry
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (47) : 5104 - 5121
  • [39] Can agricultural subsidies reduce gendered productivity gaps? Panel data evidence from Zambia
    Ngoma, Hambulo
    Machina, Henry
    Kuteya, Auckland N.
    DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2021, 39 (02) : 303 - 323
  • [40] Do subsidies drive productivity? Farm-level evidence from the Russian Far East
    Vasilyeva, Olga G.
    Bilko, Andrey M.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2022, (02): : 120 - 146