Exploring new methods for assessing landscape ecological risk in key basin

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Shaokun [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Bing [3 ]
Zhang, Zhao [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wang, Lei [3 ]
Zhang, Zhi [4 ]
Che, Xiaoqian [5 ]
Wang, Zhuangzhuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Natl Safety & Emergency Management, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Joint Int Res Lab Catastrophe Simulat & Syst Risk, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Ctr China Geol Survey, Cent South China Innovat Ctr Geosci, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan 430100, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Production-living-ecological" space; Landscape ecological risk; Land-use change; Geostatistical simulation; Ecologically appropriate scales; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142633
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientific assessment of landscape ecological risk (LER) aims to optimize land use patterns and mitigate regional ecological hazards. However, accurate LER assessment requires the selection of a feasible spatial analysis scale. This study identified the optimal spatial scale by analyzing high-resolution data from 2006, 2012, and 2019. Within the "production-living-ecological" spatial (PLES) perspective, this study employed six methods to depict the pattern changes and spatiotemporal variations of LER. These included the Markov transfer matrix model, the geoscience information atlas-gravity center model (GIAGC), the LER index model, Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors, the Sequential Gaan simulation (MAF-SGS) multivariate geostatistical model, and spatial autocorrelation. The results are as follows: 1) A granularity of 10 m and a magnitude of 200 m are the most effective parameters for LER assessment. 2) From 2006 to 2019, there was a shift in the structure of the landscape pattern from "ecological space" to "productive space", accompanied by a tendency for the center of gravity to shift towards the southwest. 3) The non-structural spatial factors contributing to LER are gradually increasing, and the maximum variability is steadily rising. Medium-low risk areas dominate the basin, and the spatial distribution of LER exhibits an overall pattern: high in the center, low in the southwest, and low in the northwest. Specifically, a low-low spatial clustering pattern is predominant; however, there is a general upward trend in LER. In summary, this study provides a scientific basis for adjusting basin land use structures, resolving ecological risks, and promoting high-quality sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ecological dynamic regimes: A key concept for assessing ecological resilience
    Sanchez-Pinillos, Martina
    Dakos, Vasilis
    Kefi, Sonia K.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 289
  • [22] Discussion on Key Points of Ecological Landscape Design in Downtown Landscape Planning
    Wang, Ruoyao
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 16 : 331 - 334
  • [23] Exploring the impact of landscape changes on runoff under climate change and urban development: Implications for landscape ecological engineering in the Yangmei River Basin
    Zhao, Xiaoying
    Huang, Guoru
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 184
  • [24] Exploring a multisource-data framework for assessing ecological environment conditions in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Tian, Yuqing
    Wen, Zongguo
    Zhang, Xiu
    Cheng, Manli
    Xu, Mao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 848
  • [25] Evaluation of landscape ecological risk in key ecological functional zone of South-to-North Water Diversion Project, China
    Tan, Li
    Luo, Wei
    Yang, Bin
    Huang, Meng
    Shuai, Shuang
    Cheng, Congxi
    Zhou, Xiao
    Li, Mengna
    Hu, Canwei
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 147
  • [26] Assessment of landscape ecological risk for a cross-border basin: A case study of the Koshi River Basin, central Himalayas
    Wang, Beibei
    Ding, Mingjun
    Li, Shicheng
    Liu, Linshan
    Ai, Jiahui
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117 (117)
  • [27] Landscape pattern evolution and ecological risk assessment of the Yellow River Basin based on optimal scale
    Wang, Qianxu
    Zhang, Pengyan
    Chang, Yinghui
    Li, Guanghui
    Chen, Zhuo
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Xing, Guangrui
    Lu, Rong
    Li, Mengfan
    Zhou, Zhimin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [28] Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment for the Tarim River Basin on the Basis of Land-Use Change
    Wang, Guangyao
    Ran, Guangyan
    Chen, Yaning
    Zhang, Zhengyong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [29] Optimal Scale and Scenario Simulation Analysis of Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment in the Shiyang River Basin
    Xie, Jinfeng
    Zhao, Jun
    Zhang, Sheshu
    Sun, Ziyun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [30] Land Use Change and Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Terrain Gradients in Yuanmou Basin
    Zhao, Lei
    Shi, Zhengtao
    He, Guangxiong
    He, Li
    Xi, Wenfei
    Jiang, Qin
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (09)