Exploring new methods for assessing landscape ecological risk in key basin

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Shaokun [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Bing [3 ]
Zhang, Zhao [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wang, Lei [3 ]
Zhang, Zhi [4 ]
Che, Xiaoqian [5 ]
Wang, Zhuangzhuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Natl Safety & Emergency Management, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Joint Int Res Lab Catastrophe Simulat & Syst Risk, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Ctr China Geol Survey, Cent South China Innovat Ctr Geosci, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Yangtze Univ, Sch Geosci, Wuhan 430100, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Production-living-ecological" space; Landscape ecological risk; Land-use change; Geostatistical simulation; Ecologically appropriate scales; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142633
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientific assessment of landscape ecological risk (LER) aims to optimize land use patterns and mitigate regional ecological hazards. However, accurate LER assessment requires the selection of a feasible spatial analysis scale. This study identified the optimal spatial scale by analyzing high-resolution data from 2006, 2012, and 2019. Within the "production-living-ecological" spatial (PLES) perspective, this study employed six methods to depict the pattern changes and spatiotemporal variations of LER. These included the Markov transfer matrix model, the geoscience information atlas-gravity center model (GIAGC), the LER index model, Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors, the Sequential Gaan simulation (MAF-SGS) multivariate geostatistical model, and spatial autocorrelation. The results are as follows: 1) A granularity of 10 m and a magnitude of 200 m are the most effective parameters for LER assessment. 2) From 2006 to 2019, there was a shift in the structure of the landscape pattern from "ecological space" to "productive space", accompanied by a tendency for the center of gravity to shift towards the southwest. 3) The non-structural spatial factors contributing to LER are gradually increasing, and the maximum variability is steadily rising. Medium-low risk areas dominate the basin, and the spatial distribution of LER exhibits an overall pattern: high in the center, low in the southwest, and low in the northwest. Specifically, a low-low spatial clustering pattern is predominant; however, there is a general upward trend in LER. In summary, this study provides a scientific basis for adjusting basin land use structures, resolving ecological risks, and promoting high-quality sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring Changes in Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in Key Regions of the Belt and Road Initiative Countries
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Yao, Litang
    Luo, Jun
    Liang, Wenjuan
    [J]. LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [2] Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment
    Li, Qingpu
    Zhang, Zhengdong
    Wan, Luwen
    Yang, Chuanxun
    Zhang, Jie
    Ye, Chen
    Chen, Yuchan
    [J]. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74 (07): : 1420 - 1437
  • [3] Application of geographical detector and geographically weighted regression for assessing landscape ecological risk in the Irtysh River Basin, Central Asia
    Li, Mingrui
    Abuduwailia, Jilili
    Liu, Wen
    Feng, Sen
    Saparov, Galymzhan
    Ma, Long
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [4] Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle framework
    Luo, Fanghan
    Liu, Yanxu
    Peng, Jian
    Wu, Jiansheng
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 180 : 125 - 134
  • [5] Optimization of landscape pattern in China Luojiang Xiaoxi basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment
    Li, Shaokun
    He, Wenxi
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Zhi
    Chen, Xiaoqian
    Lei, Tianci
    Wang, Shaojun
    Wang, Zhuangzhuang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 146
  • [6] Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Selenga River Basin
    Li, Wangping
    Lin, Qingrun
    Hao, Junming
    Wu, Xiaodong
    Zhou, Zhaoye
    Lou, Peiqing
    Liu, Yadong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [7] Ecological Risk Assessment of Guangxi Xijiang River Basin based on Landscape Pattern
    Yan, Y.
    Shi, S. N.
    Hu, B. Q.
    Yang, K. S.
    [J]. EKOLOJI, 2018, 27 (105): : 5 - 16
  • [8] Watershed landscape ecological risk assessment and landscape pattern optimization: Take Fujiang River Basin as an example
    Zhang, Xuemao
    Du, Huaming
    Wang, Ying
    Chen, Yan
    Ma, Li
    Dong, Tingxu
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 27 (9-10): : 2254 - 2276
  • [9] Exploring the Impact of Landscape Ecological Risk on Water Quality in the Danjiangkou Reservoir, China
    Cao, Zhenxiu
    Wan, Bo
    Xiao, Yuhuang
    Wu, Minghui
    Tan, Xiang
    Zhang, Quanfa
    Wang, Dezhi
    [J]. EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (09)
  • [10] Assessing vegetation dynamics and landscape ecological risk on the mainstream of Tarim River, China
    Zhang, Hui
    Xue, Lianqing
    Wei, Guanghui
    Dong, Zengchuan
    Meng, Xianyong
    [J]. Water (Switzerland), 2020, 12 (08):