Denaturalization and denationalization in comparison (France, the United Kingdom, the United States)

被引:5
|
作者
Weil, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 01, CNRS, Ctr Hist Sociale 20 Eme Siecle,9 Rue Malher, F-75004 Paris, France
关键词
citizenship; denationalization; denaturalization; dual citizenship; human rights; judicial review; recognition of citizenship;
D O I
10.1177/0191453717704133
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Denaturalization and denationalization were once much more common among western democracies. From 1906 till 1968, the United States of America, France and the United Kingdom denationalized their citizens by hundreds and thousands, for fraud or illegality during the process of naturalization, for dual citizenship, or for banal default of loyalty. In a context of a war against terror' we are now seeing an apparent return to the past - with the resuming of denationalization policies and provisions. However, the previous restriction imposed through courts and judicial bodies on the power to denaturalize in the USA, France and the UK, the international recognition of citizenship as the most important human right, the transformation of nationality and the acceptance of dual citizenship, and the impact and meaning of citizenship in a republic explain why, while being hotly debated and highly supported by the majority of citizens, denationalization has resumed only symbolically in the USA and France, if not in the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 429
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Drug Review in Canada: A Comparison With Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States
    Nigel S. B. Rawson
    Kenneth I. Kaitin
    Kate E. Thomas
    Grant Perry
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 1998, 32 (4): : 1133 - 1141
  • [42] Comparison of Digitized Book Index among Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom
    Agata, Teru
    Ueda, Shuichi
    2019 ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES (JCDL 2019), 2019, : 378 - 379
  • [43] Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States
    Armour, John
    Black, Bernard
    Cheffins, Brian
    Nolan, Richard
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2009, 6 (04) : 687 - 722
  • [44] Drug review in Canada: A comparison with Australia, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States
    Rawson, NSB
    Kaitin, KI
    Thomas, KE
    Perry, G
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 1998, 32 (04): : 1133 - 1141
  • [45] Comparison of the United Kingdom and United States approaches to approval of new neuromuscular therapies
    Gallagher, Gary W.
    Nowacek, Dustin
    Gutgsell, Olivia
    Callaghan, Brian C.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2021, 64 (06) : 641 - 650
  • [46] Approval of new drugs in the United States - Comparison with the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan
    Kessler, DA
    Hass, AE
    Feiden, KL
    Lumpkin, M
    Temple, R
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22): : 1826 - 1831
  • [47] Crime prevention policy and government research: A comparison of the United States and United Kingdom
    Laycock, G
    Clarke, RV
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 42 (1-2) : 235 - 255
  • [48] The effect of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women: A comparison of studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France
    Cramer, Joyce A.
    Lynch, Niall O.
    Gaudin, Anne-Francoise
    Walker, Mel
    Cowell, Warren
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 28 (10) : 1686 - 1694
  • [49] A COMPARISON OF THE EVOLUTION OF PAYER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN ONCOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES, GERMANY, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS
    Runyan, A.
    Yi, J.
    Pavic, M.
    Bodagala, M.
    Schoenwaelder, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S245 - S245
  • [50] INDUSTRIAL MANAGERS IN BELGIUM, FRANCE AND UNITED-KINGDOM - COMPARISON
    CLARK, DG
    MOSSON, TM
    MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 1967, 7 (2-3) : 95 - 100