Sustainable agriculture in the EU and China: A comparative critical policy analysis approach

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Junyu [1 ,3 ]
Drury, Matt [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Campus Fryslan, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Sci & Engn, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Campus Frysla,Wirdumerdijk 34, NL-8911 CE Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
Critical policy analysis; Comparative study; Sustainable agriculture; The EU; China; FOOD SECURITY; ORGANIC AGRICULTURE; BIODIVERSITY; AGROECOLOGY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103789
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agriculture is a significant contributor to global environmental problems such as greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. The EU and China are key players in this regard, and both have introduced policies for sustainable agriculture. This research takes a critical policy analysis approach to investigate the extent to which current EU and Chinese agricultural policies reproduce discourses which are commensurate with a transition to a more sustainable agriculture. Drawing on a four-phase methodology for critical policy analysis, we analyse policy documents from the EU and China, comparing them and positioning them on a heuristic scale of weak to strong sustainability. Three positions from weak to strong sustainability are distinguished, namely the technoeconomic/productionist, blended, and agroecological/ruralist. Our findings suggest that agricultural policies of both the EU and China have reproduced the dominant techno-economic/productionist position, leaning towards weak sustainability, while policy discourses aligned with a fundamental transformation of agriculture to strong sustainability are marginalised. Such a shared policy orientation towards weak sustainability is rooted in policymaking processes of the EU and China, albeit manifested differently in the two political contexts. Based on our reflections of the common patterns underlying the agricultural policy discourses, we call for deeper cultural and social critique on current discourses and more participatory and reflexive policymaking processes to embrace alternative discourses.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital Technology-and-Services-Driven Sustainable Transformation of Agriculture: Cases of China and the EU
    Qin, Tianyu
    Wang, Lijun
    Zhou, Yanxin
    Guo, Liyue
    Jiang, Gaoming
    Zhang, Lei
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [22] Moving towards sustainable development: rhetoric, policy and reality of ecological agriculture in China
    Shi, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2003, 10 (03): : 195 - 210
  • [23] A Multicriteria Approach for Assessing the Impact of ICT on EU Sustainable Regional Policy
    Koliouska, Christiana
    Andreopoulou, Zacharoula
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [24] Sustainable Ecological Agriculture in China
    Goodland, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 89 : 203 - 203
  • [25] EU competition policy and US antitrust: a comparative analysis
    Bartalevich, Dzmitry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 44 (01) : 91 - 112
  • [26] IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture
    Daniel, Buda
    Hoinaru, Razvan
    Mocanu, Mihaela
    Roman, Aureliana-Geta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2019, 13 (01): : 829 - 839
  • [27] The Effects of Economic Policy Instruments of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of China and the UK
    Zou, Jinpeng
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Liu, Fang
    Wang, Fang
    Du, Mingling
    Wu, Bin
    Yang, Ni
    WATER, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [28] Integrated farming systems an important approach toward sustainable agriculture in China
    Li, WH
    Min, QW
    AMBIO, 1999, 28 (08) : 655 - 662
  • [29] SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE - POLICY OPTIONS AND PROSPECTS
    BENBROOK, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE, 1989, 4 (3-4): : 153 - 159
  • [30] IMPROVING POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
    VANKOOTEN, GC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1991, 39 (04): : 655 - 663