Science and citizen deliberation - a promising coalition?

被引:0
|
作者
Blum, Mareike [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commonsand Climate Change, Sci Assessments Ethics & Publ Policy, Berlin, Germany
关键词
citizen deliberation; social learning; climate policy; transdisciplinary research; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; DEMOCRACY; PATHWAYS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1080/13511610.2024.2349631
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Many countries, including Germany have struggled to agree on ambitious climate action, in part because technocratic policy advice failed to adequately consider the social and political consequences. The combination of science and citizen deliberation could enable a new coalition to stimulate policy learning along different climate policy options. The Ariadne Project was a transdisciplinary research project about different policy options for the German Energy Transition. It facilitated an iterative social learning process between researchers and citizens during focus groups, citizen conferences and online deliberations. As such, this case sheds light on a new culture of science-society relations. To assess if and how learning occurred, we ask whether the involved citizens and researchers have changed their understanding of policy options and of each other. We found that citizens were very enthusiastic about the new learning opportunities, and their roles within them. While researchers appreciated the new experience, they also faced challenges. We argue that despite these challenges, there is inherent value in providing spaces for researchers and citizens to interact with and jointly inform policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 793
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Science of Citizen Science
    Laihonen, Petteri
    Vohland, K.
    Land-Zandstra, A.
    Ceccaroni, L.
    Lemmens, R.
    Perello, J.
    Ponti, M.
    Samson, R.
    Wagenknecht, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN EDUCATION, 2023, 55 (3-4) : 232 - 234
  • [22] The influence of political knowledge on opinion polarization in citizen deliberation
    Herne, Kaisa
    Christensen, Henrik Serup
    Gronlund, Kimmo
    [J]. POLITICAL RESEARCH EXCHANGE, 2019, 1 (01): : 1 - 23
  • [23] CITIZEN CONSULTATIONS ON SCIENCE COMMUNICATION A citizen science approach
    Delicado, Ana
    Rowland, Jussara
    Vengut-Climent, Empar
    Mendoza-Poudereux, Isabel
    Gaston, Edurne
    [J]. METODE SCIENCE STUDIES JOURNAL, 2022, (12): : 47 - 53
  • [24] Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities
    Murphy, NJ
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (02) : 172 - 181
  • [25] DELIBERATION, REPRESENTATION AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE VIRTUAL POLITICAL SPACE
    Zeifer, Barbara
    [J]. ESTUDIOS SOCIALES-REVISTA UNIVERSITARIA SEMESTRAL, 2016, 51 (02): : 165 - 184
  • [26] Holding this space: navigating ethical issues in citizen deliberation
    Parry, Lucy J.
    [J]. ACTA POLITICA, 2024,
  • [27] Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity?
    Gastil, J
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2000, 17 (04) : 357 - 361
  • [28] The politics of public deliberation: citizen engagement and interest advocacy
    Connelly, Steve
    [J]. CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2013, 7 (02) : 209 - 211
  • [29] Deliberation and ecological democracy: from citizen to global system
    Niemeyer, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2020, 22 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [30] A Citizen-Led Coalition for Integrated Care
    Sang, Bob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2007, 15 (03) : 44 - 49