Science and citizen deliberation - a promising coalition?

被引:0
|
作者
Blum, Mareike [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commonsand Climate Change, Sci Assessments Ethics & Publ Policy, Berlin, Germany
关键词
citizen deliberation; social learning; climate policy; transdisciplinary research; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; DEMOCRACY; PATHWAYS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1080/13511610.2024.2349631
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Many countries, including Germany have struggled to agree on ambitious climate action, in part because technocratic policy advice failed to adequately consider the social and political consequences. The combination of science and citizen deliberation could enable a new coalition to stimulate policy learning along different climate policy options. The Ariadne Project was a transdisciplinary research project about different policy options for the German Energy Transition. It facilitated an iterative social learning process between researchers and citizens during focus groups, citizen conferences and online deliberations. As such, this case sheds light on a new culture of science-society relations. To assess if and how learning occurred, we ask whether the involved citizens and researchers have changed their understanding of policy options and of each other. We found that citizens were very enthusiastic about the new learning opportunities, and their roles within them. While researchers appreciated the new experience, they also faced challenges. We argue that despite these challenges, there is inherent value in providing spaces for researchers and citizens to interact with and jointly inform policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 793
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deliberation, Citizen Science and Covid-19
    Pearse, Harry
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2020, 91 (03): : 571 - 577
  • [2] CITIZEN SCIENCE FOR PUBLIC DELIBERATION OF LOCAL ENVIRONMENT POLICIES
    Bedessem, Baptiste
    Sourdril, Anne
    Baumstark, Valentin
    Dos Santos, Lucie
    Gonzalez, Emmanuelle
    Pelletier, Celine
    Steinman, Quentin
    Verlhac, Laura
    Julliard, Romain
    [J]. ETICA & POLITICA, 2023, 25 (02): : 105 - 127
  • [3] Evaluator as steward of citizen deliberation
    MacNeil, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2002, 23 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [4] Empathy in a Citizen Deliberation Experiment
    Gronlund, Kimmo
    Herne, Kaisa
    Setala, Maija
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2017, 40 (04) : 457 - 480
  • [5] New models of citizen deliberation
    Slaton, CD
    [J]. FUTURES, 2001, 33 (3-4) : 356 - 360
  • [6] Deliberation and civic virtue: lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment
    Gronlund, Kimmo
    Setala, Maija
    Herne, Kaisa
    [J]. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 2 (01) : 95 - 117
  • [7] Avoiding a Tyranny of the Majority: Public Deliberation as Citizen Science, Sensitive Issues, and Vulnerable Populations
    Ott, Mary A.
    Knopf, Amelia S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2019, 19 (08): : 28 - 31
  • [8] Science and deliberation
    Ravazzi, Stefania
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2008, 32 (06): : 319 - 324
  • [9] Citizen, Science, and Citizen Science
    Fan, Fa-ti
    Chen, Shun-Ling
    [J]. EAST ASIAN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [10] THE CITIZEN LABOR ENERGY COALITION
    KELSEY, J
    WIENER, D
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY, 1983, 13 (04) : 15 - 18