Multi-stakeholder initiatives and decarbonization in the European food supply chain

被引:1
|
作者
Moreira-Dantas, Ianna Raissa [1 ]
Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada [1 ,2 ]
de Araujo, Maria Luisa Fernandes [1 ]
Evans, Judith [3 ]
Foster, Alan [3 ]
Wang, Xinfang [4 ]
Thakur, Maitri [5 ]
Jafarzadeh, Sepideh [5 ]
Martin, Marta Pujol [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Fac Business & Econ, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Jaume 1, Fac Business & Econ, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
[3] London South Bank Univ, Sch Engn, London, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Chem Engn, Birmingham, England
[5] SINTEF, Trondheim, Sor Trondelag, Norway
来源
关键词
food supply chain; European green deal; farm to fork strategy; sustainable food systems; decarbonisation; MOBILIZING PRIVATE FINANCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INNOVATION; SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3389/frsus.2023.1231684
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Green Deal is a political milestone aiming to promote a carbon-neutral economy in the European Union. Decarbonizing the complex food sector requires the unified interaction among effective climate policies, economic instruments, and initiatives involving multiple stakeholders. Despite increasing efforts to highlight the importance of innovations and finance to achieve sustainable food supply chains (FSC), comprehensive information about related opportunities and barriers to mitigating emissions in the food sector is still under-explored. To cover this gap, this paper applies an existing industrial policy framework under the lens of the EU FSC to identify potential strategies that should help achieve the needed financial means and innovation actions, as well as to gauge political alignment across FSC stages. Methodologically, the pillars proposed in the framework are linked to multi-stakeholders' initiatives engaged in achieving net-zero emissions. The paper highlights three main implications of the identified interlinkages. First, political directionality related to the food sector should be more comprehensively tailored to account for the specificities of all stages of the FSC. Second, research and development projects shall likewise cover all stages, instead of emphasizing only food production and agricultural systems. Finally, multiple stakeholders are crucial as promoters of technology and innovation towards a green economy. Nevertheless, initiatives should be integrated into political discussions in order to promote civil awareness, sustainable food and services demand, aligned to political guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER INITIATIVES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS: THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERLOCUTORS
    Fowler, Alan
    Biekart, Kees
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (02) : 81 - 93
  • [22] Mapping the tire supply chain and its microplastics emissions using a multi-stakeholder approach
    Hoeke, Sya
    van Wijnen, Jikke
    Krikke, Harold
    Lohr, Ansje
    Ragas, Ad M. J.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 203
  • [23] Sustainable supply chain management practices in Indian automotive industry: A multi-stakeholder view
    Mathivathanan, Deepak
    Kannan, Devika
    Hag, A. Noorul
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 128 : 284 - 305
  • [24] Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives as Social Innovation for Governance and Practice: A Review of Responsible Mining Initiatives
    Sauer, Philipp C.
    Hiete, Michael
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [25] Reverse supply chain practices for construction and demolition waste in the Brazilian Amazon: a multi-stakeholder view
    R. Brandao
    D. J. Edwards
    A. C. S. Melo
    A. N. Macedo
    [J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2023, 25 : 2245 - 2261
  • [26] Global Value Chains and Intermediaries in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives in Pakistan and India
    Lund-Thomsen, Peter
    Riisgaard, Lone
    Singh, Sukhpal
    Ghori, Shakil
    Coe, Neil M.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2021, 52 (03) : 504 - 532
  • [27] Contestation in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Enhancing the Democratic Quality of Transnational Governance
    Arenas, Daniel
    Albareda, Laura
    Goodman, Jennifer
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2020, 30 (02) : 169 - 199
  • [28] Deliberation Without Democracy in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: A Pragmatic Way Forward
    Barlow, Rob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2022, 181 (03) : 543 - 561
  • [29] Multi-stakeholder initiatives and the divergent construction and implementation of sustainable agriculture in the USA
    Konefal, Jason
    Hatanaka, Maki
    Constance, Douglas H.
    [J]. RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (04) : 293 - 303
  • [30] Reverse supply chain practices for construction and demolition waste in the Brazilian Amazon: a multi-stakeholder view
    Brandao, R.
    Edwards, D. J.
    Melo, A. C. S.
    Macedo, A. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 25 (04) : 2245 - 2261