"What choice do we have?" Reactive and proactive decision-making for aging in place with dementia

被引:1
|
作者
Auriemma, Catherine L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Butt, Maayra I. [1 ]
Mcmillan, Julia [1 ]
Silvestri, Jasmine A. [1 ]
Chow, Carolyn [2 ]
Bahti, Melanie [1 ]
Klaiman, Tamar [1 ]
Harkins, Kristin [2 ]
Karlawish, Jason [4 ,5 ]
Halpern, Scott D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Philadelphia, Palliat & Adv Illness Res PAIR Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn Philadelphia, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn Philadelphia, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Penn Memory Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Div Geriatr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Penn Philadelphia, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
aging in place; Alzheimer's disease; caregiving; dementia; qualitative; QUALITATIVE DATA-ANALYSIS; OLDER-ADULTS; HEALTH-CARE; HOME; PREFERENCES; SERVICES; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.19140
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Promoting options for aging in place (AIP) has broad appeal to policymakers and professionals providing services to persons living with dementia (PWD). However, the benefits or burdens of AIP likely vary among individuals and families. We sought to describe factors influencing decision-making to age in place versus seek a higher level of residential care for PWD. Methods: A qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger mixed-methods study utilizing semi-structured interviews with PWD, family care partners, and dementia clinicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with constant comparison. Sample size was determined by thematic saturation within subgroups. Results: We conducted 74 interviews among 14 PWD, 36 care partners, and 24 clinicians. Preferences for AIP were driven by (1) desire to preserve independence, (2) a sense that the "best care" is delivered by loved ones and in a familiar environment, (3) distrust and fear of care facilities, and (4) caregiver guilt. PWD and care partners frequently considered moving from home as a "last resort" and wanted to avoid planning for future care needs. Many decisions to move were reactive and triggered by patient safety events, physical dependency, or the loss of caregiver. Proactive decision-making was facilitated by (1) prior experience witnessing the challenges of caring for a person with advanced dementia in the home; and (2) having substantial financial resources such that participants could seek major home adaptations or avoid "lower quality" institutions. Conclusions: Decisions regarding care setting for PWD frequently do not feel like a choice and are made under imperfect conditions. Programs using AIP as an outcome measure should recognize the various patient-centered and non-patient-centered factors that influence such choices, and interventions should be designed to promote more informed and equitable decision-making for care setting in dementia.
引用
收藏
页码:3398 / 3412
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SHOULD WE HAVE CHILDREN - A DECISION-MAKING GROUP FOR COUPLES
    KIMBALL, KK
    MCCABE, ME
    PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1981, 60 (03): : 153 - 156
  • [22] CRITERIA FOR DECISION-MAKING ON DRUG FINANCING IN SPAIN: HOW DO WE MEASURE THEM AND WHAT RELEVANCE DOES EACH ONE HAVE?
    Rejon-Parrilla, J. C.
    Espin, J.
    Perez-Troncoso, D.
    Epstein, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S290 - S290
  • [23] What do we know on variables influencing clinical decision-making in elderly cancer patients?
    Monfardini, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (01) : 12 - 14
  • [24] Making do with what we have: use your bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2012, 36 (03) : 177 - 180
  • [25] Making Do With What We Have: Use Your Bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    MICROCIRCULATION, 2012, 19 (06) : 563 - 566
  • [26] Making do with what we have: use your bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 39 (09) : 747 - 750
  • [27] Making do with what we have: use your bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 97 (09) : 995 - 998
  • [28] Making do with what we have: use your bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2012, 590 (15): : 3403 - 3406
  • [29] Making do with what we have: use your bootstraps
    Calmettes, Guillaume
    Drummond, Gordon B.
    Vowler, Sarah L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 167 (02) : 233 - 237
  • [30] Why do we need for timeliness of research in decision-making?
    de Jong, Judith
    Hansen, J.
    Groenewegen, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29