Investigating the Usefulness of Product Reviews Through Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

被引：0

作者：

Zafarghandi, Atefeh Keshavarzi ^{[1
]}

Qi, Ji ^{[2
]}

Hollink, Laura ^{[3
]}

Sang, Erik Tjong Kim ^{[2
]}

Ceolin, Davide ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[2] Netherlands eSci Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands

[3] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, Amsterdam, Netherlands

来源：

WEB ENGINEERING, ICWE 2024 | 2024年 / 14629卷

基金：

荷兰研究理事会;

关键词：

Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks; Product Reviews; Review Usefulness; ACCEPTABILITY; HELPFULNESS;

D O I：

10.1007/978-3-031-62362-2_21

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

The importance of useful product reviews cannot be overstated, as they not only provide crucial information to potential buyers but also offer valuable feedback to the businesses or individuals under review. Providing useful reviews to consumers has gained significant attention as an effective market analysis tool for companies. Numerous studies have delved into the facets that contribute to predicting the usefulness of reviews, encompassing a spectrum from philosophical insights to advancements in artificial intelligence. In this work, we study how to use the argument structure of reviews to identify the most useful reviews in a set of annotated product reviews. In particular, we use quantitative bipolar argumentation frameworks (QBAFs) to construct a model of review arguments and topics, and we apply reasoning to such a model to identify useful reviews. Our results show that indeed argument reasoning, and QBAFs in particular, provide an insightful and well-performing means to analyze the usefulness of reviews.

引用

页码：296 / 308

页数：13

共 50 条

[1] Labeled Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Escanuela Gonzalez, Melisa G.
Budan, Maximiliano C. D.
Simari, Gerardo, I
Simari, Guillermo R.
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
[2] Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
Escanuela Gonzalez M.G.
Budan M.C.D.
Simari G.I.
Simari G.R.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
[3] Gradual valuation for bipolar argumentation frameworks
Cayrol, C
Lagasquie-Schiex, MC
SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 366 - 377
[4] Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks with Specialized Supports
Nouioua, Farid
Risch, Vincent
22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI 2010), PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 2010,
[5] On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
Cayrol, C
Lagasquie-Schiex, MC
SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 378 - 389
[6] Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Proietti, Carlo
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2016, 287 : 41 - 52
[7] Generalizing Complete Semantics to Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Potyka, Nico
SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, ECSQARU 2021, 2021, 12897 : 130 - 143
[8] Computing Argumentative Explanations in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Zeng, Zhiwei
Miao, Chunyan
Leung, Cyril
Shen, Zhiqi
Chin, Jing Jih
THIRTY-THIRD AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE / THIRTY-FIRST INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE / NINTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 10079 - 10080
[9] Generalising Semantics to Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Cordeiro, Renan
Alcantara, Joao
INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PT I, 2022, 13653 : 520 - 534
[10] Analysing Product Reviews Using Probabilistic Argumentation
Noor, Kawsar
Hunter, Anthony
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2020), 2020, 326 : 295 - 306

← 1 2 3 4 5 →