Integration of Sustainability in Risk Management and Operational Excellence through the VIKOR Method Considering Comparisons between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

被引:4
|
作者
Yazo-Cabuya, Eliana Judith [1 ]
Ibeas, Asier [2 ]
Herrera-Cuartas, Jorge Aurelio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Fac Ciencias Nat & Ingn, Carrera 4 22-61, Bogota 110311, Colombia
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Telecomunicac & Ingn Sistemas, Barcelona 08193, Spain
关键词
organizational risk management; organizational risks with a focus on sustainability; multi-criteria decision making (MCDM); VI & scaron; ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR); analytical hierarchy process (AHP); analytical network process (ANP); operational excellence management system (OEMS); PERFORMANCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su16114585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the current context, organizations face an important challenge in managing risks related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. This research presents a general method for prioritizing organizational risks with a focus on sustainability based on the characterization of five typologies of organizational risks and their respective sub-risks, based on an analysis of global reports. Subsequently, paired surveys are administered to a group of experts from various sectors, who assign importance to the organizational sub-risks. Their responses serve as the basis for the prioritization of these risks, using the VI & scaron;ekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method, which highlights the following most relevant organizational sub-risks for each type of risk: (1) Lack of ethics in the conduct of business (geopolitical risk); (2) Deficit in economic growth (economic risk); (3) Chemical safety (social risk); (4) Massive data fraud or theft incidents (technological risk); and (5) Water depletion (environmental risk). Additionally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the robustness of the results of the VIKOR method and then compare the correlation coefficients with respect to the results obtained in previous studies for the AHP and ANP methods. Finally, we propose the implementation of a model to manage organizational risks, which are addressed proactively through an integral vision, allowing for continuous improvement and alignment with corporate strategy by means of an operational excellence management system (OEMS).
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries The entropy weight and VIKOR methods
    Van Thac Dang
    Dang, Wilson V. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) : 119 - 130
  • [22] Utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammel, Robert J., II
    COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2021, 25 (04): : 863 - 872
  • [23] Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making
    Garcia, Solange
    Cintra, Yara
    Torres, Rita de Cassia S. R.
    Lima, Fabiano Guasti
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 136 : 181 - 196
  • [24] A multi-criteria decision-making method based on triangular interval-valued fuzzy numbers and the VIKOR method
    Wang, Xingang
    Wang, Ke
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 40 (01) : 221 - 233
  • [25] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [26] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [27] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865
  • [28] A systematic review on MIVES: A sustainability-oriented multi-criteria decision-making method
    Boix-Cots, David
    Pardo-Bosch, Francesc
    Blanco, Ana
    Aguado, Antonio
    Pujadas, Pablo
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 223
  • [29] Multiplicative multi-criteria analysis method for decision-making
    Zizovic, Miodrag M.
    Damljanovic, Nada
    Zizovic, Malisa R.
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 10 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [30] Performance evaluation of sustainability in a textile firm via multi-criteria decision-making method
    Gonca, Simsek Guenduez
    Cagdas, Guenduez
    INDUSTRIA TEXTILA, 2023, 74 (04): : 426 - 432