Rooting behavior of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) hardwood cuttings in relation to genotype and irrigation frequency

被引:0
|
作者
Salih, Kocher Omer [1 ]
Mohammed, Aram Akram [1 ]
Faraj, Jamal Mahmood [1 ]
Raouf, Anwar Mohammed [1 ]
Tahir, Nawroz Abdul-Razzak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sulaimani, Coll Agr Engn Sci, Hort Dept, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
关键词
rooting percentage; root number; shoot length; chlorophyll; irrigation interval; PROPAGATION; GROWTH; IBA;
D O I
10.36253/jaeid-13837
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The study was conducted to determine the best irrigation frequency for rooting hardwood cuttings of some pomegranate genotypes that are cultivated in Halabja province, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. The hardwood cuttings were collected Twekl Asture' (G9), 'Malesay Twekl Tank' (G10), and 'Sura Hanary Trsh' (G11). The genotypes were subjected to irrigation applications by 1-day, 2-day, 7-day, or 10-day frequencies. Among pomegranates, G11, G6, and G7 produced 95, 90, and 83% rooting percentages, which were significantly higher than the rest of other genotypes. The lowest rooting percentages (28, 36, 38, and 40%) were found in G1, G5, G3, and G10, respectively. The effect of irrigation frequencies on the genotypes confirmed that a 7-day frequency was the best irrigation frequency to achieve the maximum rooting percentages (93, 86, 80, 73, 53, and 40%) in G6, G9, G2, G4, G3, and G1, respectively. In contrast, the minimum rooting percentage (20%) was recorded in G3 with a 1-day frequency and in G1 with 10-day frequency. In this study, it was found that the cuttings of G11, G6, and G7 had the best ability to form roots, and irrigation with a 7-day frequency was the best for the cuttings of all the 11 pomegranate genotypes investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Phytochemical properties and bioactive compounds of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)
    Khadivi, Ali
    Rezagholi, Maryam
    Shams, Mostafakamal
    JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 99 (06): : 639 - 652
  • [32] Utilization of the pomegranate tree (Punica granatum L.) in the paper industry
    Gulsoy, Sezgin Koray
    Pekgozlu, Ayben Kilic
    Aktas, Asli Ceren
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2015, 39 (02) : 295 - 299
  • [33] Antimicrobial activity of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit peels
    Al-Zoreky, N. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 134 (03) : 244 - 248
  • [34] Morphological and pomological variation of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes
    Ali Khadivi
    Akram-Sadat Hosseini
    Amineh Naderi
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2024, 71 : 1521 - 1528
  • [35] RAPD analysis of Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars
    Nourmohammadi, Z.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 150 (03): : S196 - S196
  • [36] Aril browning in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is caused by the seed
    Shivashankar, S.
    Singh, Hemlata
    Sumathi, M.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2012, 103 (01): : 26 - 28
  • [37] GENETIC ANALYSIS OF EXOTIC GERMPLASMS OF POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM L.)
    Sinha, Suparna
    Thakur, Dinesh Singh
    Kundu, Manoj
    Ahmad, Feza
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2020, 49 (01): : 105 - 112
  • [38] Root Distribution Pattern in Pomegranate 'Ganesh' (Punica granatum L.)
    Hiwale, S. S.
    More, T. A.
    Bagle, B. G.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POMEGRANATE AND MINOR - INCLUDING MEDITERRANEAN - FRUITS: ISPMMF2009, 2011, 890 : 323 - 326
  • [39] Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)
    José Miguel Soriano
    Elena Zuriaga
    Pía Rubio
    Gerardo Llácer
    Rodrigo Infante
    Maria Luisa Badenes
    Molecular Breeding, 2011, 27 : 119 - 128
  • [40] The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genome and the genomics of punicalagin biosynthesis
    Qin, Gaihua
    Xu, Chunyan
    Ming, Ray
    Tang, Haibao
    Guyot, Romain
    Kramer, Elena M.
    Hu, Yudong
    Yi, Xingkai
    Qi, Yongjie
    Xu, Xiangyang
    Gao, Zhenghui
    Pan, Haifa
    Jian, Jianbo
    Tian, Yinping
    Yue, Zhen
    Xu, Yiliu
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2017, 91 (06): : 1108 - 1128