Clinical effectiveness and safety of gemcitabine plus capecitabine in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Ya [1 ]
Zhu, Yulan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing 213003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Gemcitabine; capecitabine; triple-negative breast cancer; effectiveness; safety; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.62347/QOWN3646
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of Gemcitabine (GEM) plus Capecitabine (CAP) for advanced triple -negative breast cancer (aTNBC). Methods: Eighty aTNBC patients treated in Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between June 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively included and divided into an observation group (Obs; 42 cases treated with GEM + CAP) and a control group (Con; 38 cases treated with docetaxel + CAP) according to different chemotherapy regimens. The clinical effectiveness and the serum levels of tumor markers and inflammatory factors pre- and post -treatment were detected for comparative analyses. In addition, the two groups were compared in terms of side effects, 1 -year survival, and quality of life after 1 month of treatment. Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis. Results: Higher clinical effectiveness was observed in the Obs group compared to the Con (P < 0.05). The pre-treatment TPS, CA153, TNF-alpha, and IL -6 levels were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05); however, better post -treatment TPS, CA153, and inflammatory factors were observed in the Obs group compared to the Con (all P < 0.05). The Obs group also showed markedly lower drug -induced toxicities than the Con group, with higher 1 -year survival and better quality -of -life after 1 month of treatment (all P < 0.05). According to multivariate analysis, clinical stage and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, and GEM + CAP chemotherapy was a protective prognostic factor. Conclusions: GEM + CAP is effective in treating aTNBC and provides clinical benefit for patients, with fewer side effects and good patient tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1952
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Formulation of a triple combination gemcitabine plus romidepsin plus cisplatin regimen to efficaciously and safely control triple-negative breast cancer tumor development
    Pattarawat, Pawat
    Wallace, Shelby
    Pfisterer, Bianca
    Odoi, Agricola
    Wang, Hwa-Chain Robert
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 85 (01) : 141 - 152
  • [42] Comparison of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative type locally advanced breast cancer
    Kenjaeva, A. O.
    Olimova, Z. A.
    Gafurov, E. B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26
  • [43] Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Liu, Xiaoyan
    Lang, Yitian
    Liao, Yahui
    Zhu, Yizhun
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [44] Phase 1b Clinical Trial with Alpelisib plus Olaparib for Patients with Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Batalini, Felipe
    Xiong, Niya
    Tayob, Nabihah
    Polak, Madeline
    Eismann, Julia
    Cantley, Lewis C.
    Shapiro, Geoffrey, I
    Adalsteinsson, Viktor
    Winer, Eric P.
    Konstantinopoulos, Panagiotis A.
    D'Andrea, Alan
    Swisher, Elizabeth M.
    Matulonis, Ursula A.
    Wulf, Gerburg M.
    Mayer, Erica L.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (08) : 1493 - 1499
  • [45] The Clinical Value of Chemotherapy Combined With Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer-A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Zilin
    Ma, Kai
    Li, Jing
    Guan, Yeneng
    Yang, Chaobo
    Yan, Aqin
    Zhu, Hongda
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [46] Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model
    Rui, Mingjun
    Shi, Fenghao
    Shang, Ye
    Meng, Rui
    Li, Hongchao
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2020, 37 (09) : 3761 - 3774
  • [47] Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model
    Mingjun Rui
    Fenghao Shi
    Ye Shang
    Rui Meng
    Hongchao Li
    Advances in Therapy, 2020, 37 : 3761 - 3774
  • [48] An initial safety study of gedatolisib plus cofetuzumab pelidotin for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Radovich, Milan
    Solzak, Jeffrey P.
    Hancock, Bradley A.
    Badve, Sunil
    Storniolo, Anna Maria V.
    Ballinger, Tarah J.
    Schneider, Bryan P.
    Miller, Kathy D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [49] Targeting triple-negative breast cancer: A clinical perspective
    Popovic, Lazar S.
    Matovina-Brko, Gorana
    Popovic, Maja
    Punie, Kevin
    Cvetanovic, Ana
    Lambertini, Matteo
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 31 (03) : 221 - 238
  • [50] Clinical trials of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Frederick M. Howard
    Alexander T. Pearson
    Rita Nanda
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2022, 195 : 1 - 15