The reliability and validity of brief cognitive screening tools used in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Mclaren, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Fradera, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
Cullen, Breda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Clarice Pears Bldg,90 Byres Rd, Glasgow City G128TB, Scotland
[2] NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Ayr, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Motherwell, Scotland
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Screening tool; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychological test; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric assessment; STATUS EXAMINATION COGNISTAT; ACUTE CONCUSSION EVALUATION; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; BNI SCREEN; IMPAIRMENT; DEMENTIA; UTILITY; STROKE; TESTS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/09602011.2024.2357850
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reliable and valid cognitive screening tools are essential in the assessment of those with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, there is no consensus about which tool should be used in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed psychometric properties of cognitive screening tools for detecting cognitive impairment in TBI. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed validation studies of a cognitive screening tool(s); with a sample of adults aged 18-80 diagnosed with TBI (mild-severe); and with psychometrics consistent with COSMIN guidelines. Published literature was retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on 27 January 2022. A narrative synthesis was performed. Thirty-four studies evaluated the psychometric properties of a total of 22 cognitive screening tools, in a variety of languages. Properties assessed included structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity (or diagnostic test accuracy), convergent/divergent validity, and discriminant validity. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were the most widely validated cognitive screening tools for use in TBI. The MoCA had the most promising evidence of its psychometric properties, which has implications for clinical practice. Future research should aim to follow standard criteria for psychometric studies to allow meaningful comparisons across the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review of treatments for mild traumatic brain injury
    Comper, P
    Bisschop, SM
    Carnide, N
    Tricco, A
    BRAIN INJURY, 2005, 19 (11) : 863 - 880
  • [42] Traumatic brain injury in dogs and cats: a systematic review
    Dos Santos, L. O.
    Caldas, G. G.
    Santos, C. R. O.
    Junior, D. B.
    VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2018, 63 (08) : 345 - 357
  • [43] Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury
    Perel P.
    Edwards P.
    Wentz R.
    Roberts I.
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6 (1)
  • [44] In Vitro Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Wu, Yi-Han
    Rosset, Samuel
    Lee, Tae-rin
    Dragunow, Mike
    Park, Thomas
    Shim, Vickie
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2021, 38 (17) : 2336 - 2372
  • [45] Supplemental oxygen for traumatic brain injury: A systematic review
    Hansen, Thea Ellehammer
    Christensen, Rasmus Ejlersgaard
    Baekgaard, Josefine
    Steinmetz, Jacob
    Rasmussen, Lars S.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 66 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [46] Neuropsychological Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Ramos-Galarza, Carlos
    Obregon, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (04)
  • [47] The reliability and validity of the Life Satisfaction Index-A with survivors of traumatic brain injury
    Lobello, SG
    Underhill, AT
    Fine, PR
    BRAIN INJURY, 2004, 18 (11) : 1127 - 1134
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the Wisconsin HSS Quality of Life Inventory in traumatic brain injury
    Collins, R
    Lanham, RA
    Sigford, BJ
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2000, 15 (05) : 1139 - 1148
  • [49] Test-Retest Reliability of the Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Instrument
    Van Dyke, Sarah A.
    Axelrod, Bradley N.
    Schutte, Christian
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2010, 175 (12) : 947 - 949
  • [50] Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the VA Traumatic Brain Injury Screening Tool
    Donnelly, Kerry T.
    Donnelly, James P.
    Dunnam, Mina
    Warner, Gary C.
    Kittleson, C. J.
    Constance, Janet E.
    Bradshaw, Charles B.
    Alt, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2011, 26 (06) : 439 - 453