The reliability and validity of brief cognitive screening tools used in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Mclaren, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Fradera, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
Cullen, Breda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Clarice Pears Bldg,90 Byres Rd, Glasgow City G128TB, Scotland
[2] NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Ayr, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Motherwell, Scotland
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; Screening tool; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychological test; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric assessment; STATUS EXAMINATION COGNISTAT; ACUTE CONCUSSION EVALUATION; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; BNI SCREEN; IMPAIRMENT; DEMENTIA; UTILITY; STROKE; TESTS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/09602011.2024.2357850
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reliable and valid cognitive screening tools are essential in the assessment of those with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, there is no consensus about which tool should be used in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed psychometric properties of cognitive screening tools for detecting cognitive impairment in TBI. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed validation studies of a cognitive screening tool(s); with a sample of adults aged 18-80 diagnosed with TBI (mild-severe); and with psychometrics consistent with COSMIN guidelines. Published literature was retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO on 27 January 2022. A narrative synthesis was performed. Thirty-four studies evaluated the psychometric properties of a total of 22 cognitive screening tools, in a variety of languages. Properties assessed included structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, criterion validity (or diagnostic test accuracy), convergent/divergent validity, and discriminant validity. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were the most widely validated cognitive screening tools for use in TBI. The MoCA had the most promising evidence of its psychometric properties, which has implications for clinical practice. Future research should aim to follow standard criteria for psychometric studies to allow meaningful comparisons across the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of swallowing screening tools used by nurses for dysphagia: A systematic review
    Jiang, Jiin-Ling
    Fu, Shu-Ying
    Wang, Wan-Hsiang
    Ma, Yu-Chin
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 28 (02): : 41 - 48
  • [2] Screening for traumatic brain injury in an offender sample: A first look at the reliability and validity of the Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire
    Diamond, Pamela M.
    Harzke, Amy J.
    Magaletta, Philip R.
    Cummins, A. Gaye
    Frankowski, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2007, 22 (06) : 330 - 338
  • [3] A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF
    Tate, Robyn L.
    Godbee, Kali
    Sigmundsdottir, Linda
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 32 (04) : 729 - 750
  • [4] The reliability and validity of inventory-18 in persons with the brief symptom traumatic brain injury
    Meachen, Sarah-Jane
    Hanks, Robin A.
    Millis, Scott R.
    Rapport, Lisa J.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (05): : 958 - 965
  • [5] The validity of the Brain Injury Cognitive Screen (BICS) as a neuropsychological screening assessment for traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury
    Vaughan, Frances L.
    Neal, Jo Anne
    Mulla, Farzana Nizam
    Edwards, Barbara
    Coetzer, Rudi
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (03) : 544 - 568
  • [6] What is the extent of reliability and validity evidence for screening tools for cognitive and behavioral change in people with ALS? A systematic review
    Didcote, Lyndsay
    Vitoratou, Silia
    Al-Chalabi, Ammar
    Goldstein, Laura H.
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION, 2024, 25 (5-6) : 437 - 451
  • [7] Depression following traumatic brain injury: The validity of the CES-D as a brief screening device
    Bush, BA
    Novack, TA
    Schneider, JJ
    Madan, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2004, 11 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [8] Depression Following Traumatic Brain Injury: The Validity of the CES-D as a Brief Screening Device
    Beverly A. Bush
    Thomas A. Novack
    Jeffrey J. Schneider
    Alok Madan
    Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2004, 11 : 195 - 201
  • [9] A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation
    Chua, Karen S. G.
    Ng, Yee-Sien
    Yap, Samantha G. M.
    Bok, Chek-Wai
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2007, 36 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [10] COGNITIVE PARTICIPATION RATING-SCALE - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN INDEX OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY REHABILITATION
    TREM, NF
    GIGUERE, A
    BURKE, M
    GIANUTSOS, R
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1987, 68 (09): : 622 - 623