Sub-aperture recombination for sliding window SAS processing in 3D downlooking synthetic aperture sonar

被引:0
|
作者
Marston, Timothy M. [1 ]
Williams, Kevin L. [1 ]
Plotnick, Daniel S. [2 ]
机构
[1] APL UW, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] ARL PSU, University Pk, PA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Low frequency downward looking synthetic aperture sonar systems are used to create high resolution volumetric images within the sediment to identify buried objects such as unexploded ordnance (UXO), mines, pipelines, and cables. Many of these systems are towed and have a direct datalink to operators on the surface. Providing real-time feedback to operators can affect decisions such as sonar placement, track orientation, and whether or not a target has been sufficiently imaged. It has previously been demonstrated that fast factorized back-projection (FFBP) is readily adaptable to the volumetric imaging case relevant for sub-sediment synthetic aperture systems and can greatly accelerate the beamforming process. The 3D FFBP algorithm also generates secondary data products that have potential value to operators, such as high-resolution spherical coordinate sub-aperture images. Maximum intensity projections (MIP's) through these spherical coordinate images can be used to create acoustic snapshots of the sediment volume beneath the sonar. The sub-apertures generated during application of the 3D FFBP algorithm do not overlap, however, and anisotropic scattering from targets can make MIP images from adjacent sub-apertures appear disjoint, causing difficulties when tracking targets traversing the sonar's field of view. To facilitate tracking anisotropic targets through multiple sub-aperture frames a modification to the 3D FFBP algorithm is presented that allows spherical-coordinate sub-apertures to be shifted with overlap, while circumventing the computational penalty associated with re-processing entire sub-apertures.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 268
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ground Based Synthetic Aperture Radar with 3D Imaging Capability
    Pieraccini, Massimiliano
    Rojhani, Neda
    Miccinesi, Lapo
    2018 15TH EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE (EURAD), 2018, : 206 - 209
  • [32] 3D Imaging Millimeter Wave Circular Synthetic Aperture Radar
    Zhang, Renyuan
    Cao, Siyang
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (06)
  • [33] 3D Synthetic Aperture Imaging Using a Water-Jet Coupled Large Aperture Single Transducer
    Arranz, Miguel Castano
    Carlson, Johan E.
    Rantatalo, Matti
    Weston, Miles
    Risberg, Robert
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2014, : 1372 - 1375
  • [34] Volumetric interferometry for sparse 3D synthetic aperture radar with bistatic geometries
    Welsh, Richard
    Andre, Daniel
    Finnis, Mark
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2023, 59 (12)
  • [35] 3D Modelling of Urban Area Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
    Sharafzadeh, Alireza
    Esmaeily, Ali
    Dehghani, Maryam
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 46 (11) : 1785 - 1793
  • [36] The Open-Source Framework for 3D Synthetic Aperture Radar Simulation
    Drozdowicz, Jedrzej
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 (09): : 39518 - 39529
  • [37] Efficient GPU Implementation of 3D Spectral Domain Synthetic Aperture Imaging
    Lewandowski, Marcin
    Jarosik, Piotr
    Tasinkevych, Yuriy
    Walczak, Mateusz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2020,
  • [38] Comparison of 3D Synthetic Aperture Imaging and Explososcan using Phantom Measurements
    Rasmussen, Morten Fischer
    Ferin, Guillaume
    Dufait, Remi
    Jensen, Jorgen Arendt
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2012, : 113 - 116
  • [39] Synthetic Aperture Radar 3D Feature Extraction for Arbitrary Flight Paths
    Jackson, Julie A.
    Moses, Randolph L.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2012, 48 (03) : 2065 - 2084
  • [40] 3D Modelling of Urban Area Using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
    Alireza Sharafzadeh
    Ali Esmaeily
    Maryam Dehghani
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2018, 46 : 1785 - 1793