Characterization of an artisanal fishery in Argentina using the social-ecological systems framework

被引:23
|
作者
London, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Rojas, Mara L. [1 ,2 ]
Ibanez Martin, Maria M. [1 ,2 ]
Scordo, Facundo [3 ,4 ]
Huamantinco Cisneros, M. Andrea [3 ,4 ]
Lujan Bustos, M. [3 ]
Perillo, Gerardo M. E. [4 ,5 ]
Cintia Piccolo, M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Econ, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] UNS, CONICET, IIESS, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Geog & Turismo, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] UNS, CONICET, IADO, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Geol, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS | 2017年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Coastal management; community-based management; institutional analysis; Ostrom's framework; social-ecological system; BAHIA BLANCA ESTUARY; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; INSTITUTIONS; GOVERNANCE; TRAGEDY; COMMONS;
D O I
10.18352/ijc.534
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) studies how institutions (the rules of the game of a society) determine the performance of a social-economic system. Elinor Ostrom extends the institutional analysis to the collective action for a particular case, the study of the social-ecological systems (SESs) (Ostrom 1990). Any group that attempts to manage a common resource (e.g. aquifers, pastures) for optimal sustainable production must solve a set of problems in order to create institutions to facilitate collective action. Some evidences show that following a set of design principles in creating institutions can lead to overcome these problems. The aim of the paper is to apply the SES framework to an artisanal fishery community in Argentina in order to: 1) describe the principal features, key variables and relations of the small-scale fishery system; 2) detect the principal drivers of a potential common-management and the leading detractors from the current communal performance; and 3) analyze the possibility that a self-governing for sustainable fishery may appear. Several drivers for potential common-management and some detractors from the current common performance are summarized. Artisanal fishery SES is currently at a bifurcation point. A common historical and cultural root, the presence of leaderships, the relevance of local knowledge, the dependence on the resource to sustainable livelihoods and the threat of big-scale fisheries area have generated incentives to collectiveaction. But, simultaneously, internal conflicts are the most important barrier for an integrated community-based management. The heterogeneity among actors and the relevant external conditions have resulted in two groups diverging in their self-organization. The work is framed by the project COMET-LA (COmmunity-based Management of Environmental challenges in Latin America; European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme of Research and Development), which aims to identify sustainable community-based governance for the management of natural resources that can be used in different social-ecological systems in a context of climate change and increasing competition in the use of resources.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 69
页数:69
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluating stakeholder perceptions on drone use in forest restoration using a social-ecological systems framework
    Coldrey, Jessica J.
    Thompson, Benjamin S.
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (04) : 1624 - 1639
  • [32] The social-ecological system of the Kenai River Fishery (Alaska, USA)
    Lamborn, Chase C.
    Givens, Jennifer
    Lant, Christopher
    Roper, Brett
    Monz, Christopher
    Smith, Jordan W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 331
  • [33] Social learning for resilience in social-ecological systems
    de Kraker, Joop
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 28 : 100 - 107
  • [34] Social Dimensions of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Barnes, Michele L.
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2019, 1 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [35] The opioid crisis: a contextual, social-ecological framework
    Mohammad S. Jalali
    Michael Botticelli
    Rachael C. Hwang
    Howard K. Koh
    R. Kathryn McHugh
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18
  • [36] A social-ecological framework for "micromanaging" microbial services
    Peralta, Ariane L.
    Stuart, Diana
    Kent, Angela D.
    Lennon, Jay T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (09) : 524 - 531
  • [37] The fragility of robust social-ecological systems
    Anderies, John M.
    Janssen, Marco A.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (04): : 1153 - 1156
  • [38] Assemblage and relationality in social-ecological systems
    Lejano, Raul P.
    [J]. DIALOGUES IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 7 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [39] Traditional knowledge in social-ecological systems
    Folke, C
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2004, 9 (03):
  • [40] Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems
    Bodin, Orjan
    Tengo, Maria
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (02): : 430 - 439