Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:0
|
作者
Miley, Emilie N. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [3 ,4 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [5 ]
Cheatham, Scott W. [5 ]
Larkins, Lindsay W. [5 ]
Cady, Adam C. [6 ]
Baker, Russell T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Inst Sports Sci & Med, Dept Hlth Nutr & Food Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Tallahassee Orthoped Clin, Tallahassee, FL 32308 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Idaho Off Underserved & Rural Med Res, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; confirmatory factor analysis; multi-group invariance testing; latent growth-curve modeling; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; WOMAC;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171789
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the German Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    Blasimann, Angela
    Dauphinee, Sharon Wood
    Staal, J. Bart
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (12): : 989 - 993
  • [32] Systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS)
    Braaksma, C.
    Wolterbeek, N.
    Veen, M. R.
    Prinsen, C. A. C.
    Ostelo, R. W. J. G.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2020, 28 (12) : 1525 - 1538
  • [33] Longitudinal Analysis and Latent Growth Modeling of the Modified Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR)
    Miley, Emilie N.
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Cheatham, Scott W.
    Larkins, Lindsay W.
    Cady, Adam C.
    Baker, Russell T.
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [34] CORR Insights®: Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
    Nishii, Takashi
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (07) : 1545 - 1547
  • [35] Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score -: An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
    Klässbo, M
    Larsson, E
    Mannevik, E
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 32 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [36] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)
    Ozlem Yilmaz
    Ebru Demir Gul
    Hatice Bodur
    Rheumatology International, 2014, 34 : 43 - 49
  • [37] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)
    Yilmaz, Ozlem
    Gul, Ebru Demir
    Bodur, Hatice
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [38] Validation of the hip disability osteoarthritis outcome Score-12 shortform in a German cohort
    Buettner, Matthias
    Wunderlich, Felix
    Drees, Philipp
    Afghanyar, Yama
    Fischer, Sebastian
    Schippers, Philipp
    Eckhard, Lukas
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, : 4767 - 4773
  • [39] Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials
    Goodman, Susan M.
    Mehta, Bella Y.
    Mandl, Lisa A.
    Szymonifka, Jackie D.
    Finik, Jackie
    Figgie, Mark P.
    Navarro-Millan, Iris Y.
    Bostrom, Mathias P.
    Parks, Michael L.
    Padgett, Douglas E.
    McLawhorn, Alexander S.
    Antao, Vinicius C.
    Yates, Adolph J.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Lyman, Stephen L.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (05): : 1200 - +
  • [40] Normative Data of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, JR in a Healthy United States Population
    Raja, Avais
    Jenkins, Asher
    Reams, Megan
    Horst, Patrick K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (06): : 1122 - 1126