Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

被引:0
|
作者
Miley, Emilie N. [1 ,2 ]
Casanova, Madeline P. [3 ,4 ]
Pickering, Michael A. [5 ]
Cheatham, Scott W. [5 ]
Larkins, Lindsay W. [5 ]
Cady, Adam C. [6 ]
Baker, Russell T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Inst Sports Sci & Med, Dept Hlth Nutr & Food Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Tallahassee Orthoped Clin, Tallahassee, FL 32308 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, WWAMI Med Educ Program, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[4] Univ Idaho, Idaho Off Underserved & Rural Med Res, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[5] Univ Idaho, Dept Movement Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; confirmatory factor analysis; multi-group invariance testing; latent growth-curve modeling; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VERSION; WOMAC;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171789
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR)
    Miley, Emilie N.
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Cheatham, Scott W.
    Larkins, Lindsay
    Cady, Adam C.
    Baker, Russell T.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [2] Transcultural adaptation and testing of psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
    Lee, Y. K.
    Chung, C. Y.
    Koo, K. H.
    Lee, K. M.
    Lee, D. J.
    Lee, S. C.
    Park, M. S.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (07) : 853 - 857
  • [3] Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) – validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement
    Anna K Nilsdotter
    L Stefan Lohmander
    Maria Klässbo
    Ewa M Roos
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 4
  • [4] Re: Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
    van Oldenrijk, J.
    Sierevelt, I. N.
    Haverkamp, D.
    Harmse, I. W.
    Poollman, R. W.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (01) : 133 - 134
  • [5] Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
    Glinkowski, Wojciech
    Zukowska, Agnieszka
    Dymitrowicz, Malgorzata
    Wolyniec, Emilia
    Glinkowska, Boiena
    Koziol-Kaczorek, Dorota
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (10):
  • [6] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Associated Sub-scales
    Miley, Emilie N.
    Casanova, Madeline P.
    Cheatham, Scott W.
    Larkins, Lindsay
    Pickering, Michael A.
    Baker, Russell T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 18 (01): : 145 - 159
  • [7] Polish adaptation and validation of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip replacement
    Marek K. Gojło
    Przemysław T. Paradowski
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18
  • [8] Development of a simplified Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation
    Wei, X.
    Wang, Z.
    Yang, C.
    Wu, B.
    Liu, X.
    Yi, H.
    Chen, Z.
    Wang, F.
    Bai, Y.
    Li, J.
    Zhu, X.
    Li, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (12) : 1563 - 1567
  • [9] Polish adaptation and validation of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip replacement
    Gojlo, Marek K.
    Paradowski, Przemyslaw T.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [10] National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
    Larsen, Peter
    Rathleff, Michael S.
    Roos, Ewa M.
    Elsoe, Rasmus
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (11) : 6865 - 6874