Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation versus open reduction plate fixation for the management of pubic symphysis diastasis: A retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Bi, Chun [1 ]
Yin, Gang [1 ]
Cao, Lei [1 ]
Lin, Haodong [1 ]
Wang, Jiandong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Trauma, Sch Med,Trauma Ctr, 650 Xin Songjiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
关键词
Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation; Open reduction plate fixation; Pubic symphysis diastasis; PELVIC RING DISRUPTIONS; INTERNAL-FIXATION; EXTERNAL FIXATION; FRACTURES; MOBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.05.025
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Surgical intervention and fixation is the recognized measurement to treat pubic symphysis diastasis caused by high-energy trauma. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical application of modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (modified PSRF) and open reduction plate fixation (ORPF) for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Methods: The data of this retrospective analysis were collected from 32 patients with pubic symphysis diastasis managed with modified PSRF or ORPF from January 2012 to December 2017, with or without posterior fixation. Indicators of clinical assessments including operating time, intraoperative blood loss, relevant surgical complications as well as follow-up were recorded. Majeed scores were performed for functional evaluation, as well as Matta criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of reduction. Results: The average time from injury to operation was 2.9 days in modified PSRF group and 3.2 days in ORPF group. Significant differences regarding average operation time (41.8 min versus 64.3 min) and average intraoperative blood loss (46.6 ml versus 304.6 ml) were presented between modified PSRF groups and ORPF group. Neither Majeed scores nor Matta evaluation showed a significant difference between two groups. In ORPF group, the incision infection occurred in one patient and two patients developed loosening of screws. In modified PSRF group, loosening of screws was found in one patient during the operative procedure and one patient experienced femoral nerve palsy. Irritation to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) was detected in two patients in modified PSRF group. Conclusions: Satisfactory clinical outcomes were provided with applications of both fixation methods for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Modified PSRF, as a minimal invasive technique, could serve as an effective and reasonable option for treating pubic symphysis diastasis. Level of evidence: III: retrospective cohort study. Trial registration: researchregistry3906.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screw Versus Plate Fixation for Chevron Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study
    Andrews, Boyd J.
    Fallat, Lawrence M.
    Kish, John P.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 55 (01): : 81 - 84
  • [42] Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for senile osteoporotic vertebral fracture
    Liu, Gang
    Liu, Bin
    Yang, Yong
    Tian, Le
    Liu, Ya'ou
    Wang, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (03): : 1816 - 1822
  • [43] Fixation failure in patients with traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: impact of loss of reduction on early functional outcomes
    Claudio Rojas
    Ernesto Ewertz
    Jose Miguel Hormazábal
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 16
  • [44] Fixation failure in patients with traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: impact of loss of reduction on early functional outcomes
    Rojas, Claudio
    Ewertz, Ernesto
    Miguel Hormazabal, Jose
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [45] Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation as a minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an initial case series
    Wu, Xiaotian
    Liu, Zuoqing
    Fu, Wenqin
    Zhao, Shan
    Feng, Juntao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 12
  • [46] Cost Comparison of Intramedullary Screw Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Plate and Screw Technique for Metacarpal Fractures
    Choo, Stephanie
    Faust, Amanda
    Troyer, Luke
    Philips, Rachel
    London, Daniel A.
    Nuelle, Julia A. V.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2025,
  • [47] Is Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Being Superior than open Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture
    Shah, Irfanullah
    Mehmood, Khalid
    Kabrah, Danah K.
    Halawani, Mohammed M.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 16 (01): : 645 - 648
  • [48] The pubic midline exposure for symphyseal open reduction and plate fixation
    Adams M.R.
    Scolaro J.A.
    Routt M.L.C.
    Jr.
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2014, 15 (3) : 195 - 199
  • [49] Assessment of Pedicle screw-Rod implantation as an external fixation method for tibial osteotomy in a canine model
    Gooran, Mohammad Mahdi
    Mazaheri-Khameneh, Ramin
    Hashemi-Asl, Seyed Mohammad
    Hobbenaghi, Rahim
    VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 26
  • [50] Reduction and fixation capabilities of different plate designs for pubic symphysis disruption: A biomechanical comparison
    Pizanis, Antonius
    Garcia, Patric
    Santelmann, Maike
    Culemann, Ulf
    Pohlemann, Tim
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2013, 44 (02): : 183 - 188