Safety and tolerability outcomes of nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol using target-controlled infusion in routine GI endoscopy

被引:3
|
作者
Mandarino, Francesco Vito [1 ]
Fanti, Lorella [1 ]
Barchi, Alberto [1 ]
Sinagra, Emanuele [2 ]
Massimino, Luca [1 ]
Azzolini, Francesco [1 ]
Viale, Edi [1 ]
Napolitano, Maria [1 ]
Salmeri, Noemi [3 ]
Agostoni, Massimo [4 ]
Danese, Silvio [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn Ist San Raffaele Giglio, Gastroenterol & Endoscopy Unit, Cefalu, Italy
[3] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Sci Inst San Raffaele, Gynecol & Obstet Unit, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Sci Inst San Raffaele, Dept Anesthesiol, Milan, Italy
关键词
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; MODERATE SEDATION; ANESTHESIOLOGIST; GASTROENTEROLOGY; COLONOSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.023
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) is increasingly accepted, but data are limited on drug administration using target-controlled infusion (TCI) in clinical practice. TCI adjusts the drug infusion based on patient-specific parameters, maintaining a constant drug dose to reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs) because of drug overdosing and to enhance patient comfort. The aims of this study were to assess the rate of AEs and to evaluate patient satisfaction with NAAP using TCI in a retrospective cohort of 18,302 procedures. Methods: Low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists score I and II) undergoing outpatient GI endoscopic procedures, including EGDs and colonoscopies, were sequentially enrolled at IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) between May 2019 and November 2021. Results: Data from 7162 EGDs and 11,140 colonoscopies were analyzed. Mean patient age was 59.1 +/- 14.8 years, and mean body mass index was 24.9 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2 ). The male-to-female ratio was equal at 8798 (48.1%):9486 (51.9%). AEs occurred in 240 procedures (1.3%) out of the total cohort, with no differences between EGDs and colonoscopies (100 [1.4%] and 140 [1.2%], respectively; P Z .418). Most patients (15,875 [98.9%]) indicated they would likely repeat the procedure with the same sedation protocol. Age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P < .008) was the only independent factor associated with overall AEs. Conclusions: NAAP using TCI is an effective and safe sedation method for routine endoscopy. The proper propofol dosage based on individual patients and the presence of trained operators are crucial for NAAP sedation management. (Gastrointest Endosc 2024;99:914-23.)
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 923
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of target-controlled infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of propofol for sedation in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Cuiabano, Igor Seror
    Garbin, Priscila de Miranda
    Modolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro
    do Nascimento Junior, Paulo
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 73 (06): : 751 - 757
  • [32] General purpose propofol target-controlled infusion using the marsh model with adjusted weight input
    Zhong, George
    Xu, Xiabing
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2024, 38 (02) : 275 - 278
  • [33] Sedative effects of oral pregabalin premedication on intravenous sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion
    Noriko Karube
    Shinichi Ito
    Saori Sako
    Jun Hirokawa
    Takeshi Yokoyama
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2017, 31 : 586 - 592
  • [34] General purpose propofol target-controlled infusion using the marsh model with adjusted weight input
    George Zhong
    Xiabing Xu
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2024, 38 : 275 - 278
  • [35] Sedative effects of oral pregabalin premedication on intravenous sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion
    Karube, Noriko
    Ito, Shinichi
    Sako, Saori
    Hirokawa, Jun
    Yokoyama, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (04) : 586 - 592
  • [36] Propofol sedation in routine endoscopy: A case series comparing target controlled infusion vs manually controlled bolus concept
    Sarraj, Riad
    Theiler, Lorenz
    Vakilzadeh, Nima
    Krupka, Niklas
    Wiest, Reiner
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 16 (01):
  • [37] Implementation of a Bayesian based advisory tool for target-controlled infusion of propofol using qCON as control variable
    Vellinga, Remco
    Introna, Michele
    van Amsterdam, Kai
    Zhou, X. Y. Tommy
    De Smet, Tom
    Jensen, Erik Weber
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    van den Berg, Johannes P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2024, 38 (02) : 519 - 529
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane
    Fombeur, PO
    Tilleul, PR
    Beaussier, MJ
    Lorente, C
    Yazid, L
    Lienhart, AH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002, 59 (14) : 1344 - 1350
  • [39] Low effect-site concentration of propofol target-controlled infusion reduces the risk of hypotension during endoscopy in a Taiwanese population
    Hsu, Wen-Hung
    Wang, Sophie S. W.
    Shih, Hsiang-Yao
    Wu, Meng-Chieh
    Chen, Yi-Yu
    Kuo, Fu-Chen
    Yang, Hui-Ying
    Chiu, Shun-Li
    Chu, Koung-Shing
    Cheng, Kuang-I
    Wu, Deng-Chyang
    Lu, I-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2013, 14 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [40] A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion
    de Roode, A
    van Gerven, JMA
    Schoemaker, RC
    Engbers, FHM
    Olieman, W
    Kroon, JR
    Cohen, AF
    Bovill, JG
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (05): : 1056 - 1061