A New Internal Validity Index for Fuzzy c-Means Algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Nurmazianna Ismail, Khairul [1 ]
Seman, Ali [2 ]
Airin Fariza Abu Samah, Khyrina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA UiTM, Coll Comp Informat & Math, Jasin 77300, Melaka, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol MARA UiTM, Coll Comp Informat & Math, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Fuzzy systems; Fuzzy clustering; fuzzy c-means; internal validity index; fuzzy validity index; CLUSTER; CRITERION; AID;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3414415
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Fuzzy c-Means (FCM) is a popular clustering algorithm that can partition a set of objects into groups such that objects within a group are similar to each other and dissimilar to those in other groups. A validity index, either external or internal, is required to validate a cluster quality formed by the FCM algorithm. External validations require known class labels for measuring a cluster quality and serve as the clustering ground truth. In real-world data with unknown class labels, a cluster quality can be validated only via internal validations. A variety of internal validation measures with different scoring models have been developed, including minimum model, maximum model, and range model with minimum to maximum scores. No internal validation measure proposed thus far is associated with a model ranging from 0 to 1, like the clustering ground truth (external validation). Therefore, a new internal validation, namely, the fuzzy validity index (FVI), is proposed. Experimental results based on several cluster properties demonstrated that the FVI is highly promising. Overall, the scores of the FVI were comparable to the scores obtained by the external validity index, i.e., F-measure. Statistically, the correlation coefficient between the FVI and F-measure was high (around 0.8 and above), indicating their similarity. Therefore, the FVI could potentially serve as the ground truth for measuring the cluster quality of FCM.
引用
收藏
页码:85995 / 86012
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clustering Validity Evaluation Functions of Fuzzy C-means Clustering Algorithm
    Wang, Guan
    Xing, Cheng
    Wang, Jie-Sheng
    Wang, Hong-Yu
    Liu, Jia-Xu
    IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 2022, 49 (02):
  • [22] A New Intuitionistic Fuzzy c-means Clustering Algorithm
    Jiang, Hui
    Zhou, Xiaoguang
    Feng, Baisheng
    Zhang, Mingdong
    PROCEEDINGS 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONIC SCIENCES, ELECTRIC ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER (MEC), 2013, : 1116 - 1119
  • [23] A new fuzzy relational clustering algorithm based on the fuzzy C-means algorithm
    Corsini, P
    Lazzerini, B
    Marcelloni, F
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2005, 9 (06) : 439 - 447
  • [24] A new fuzzy relational clustering algorithm based on the fuzzy C-means algorithm
    P. Corsini
    B. Lazzerini
    F. Marcelloni
    Soft Computing, 2005, 9 : 439 - 447
  • [25] Electrical fuzzy C-means: A new heuristic fuzzy clustering algorithm
    Mehdizadeh, Esmaeil
    Golabzaei, Amir
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2016, 3 (01):
  • [26] ON CLUSTER VALIDITY FOR THE FUZZY C-MEANS MODEL
    PAL, NR
    BEZDEK, JC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1995, 3 (03) : 370 - 379
  • [27] Extension of fuzzy c-means algorithm
    Li, CJ
    Becerra, VM
    Deng, JM
    2004 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 405 - 409
  • [28] Complex fuzzy c-means algorithm
    Issam Dagher
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2012, 38 : 25 - 39
  • [29] Intuitive Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm
    Park, Dong-Chul
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ISSPIT 2009), 2009, : 83 - 88
  • [30] USING FUZZY C-MEANS ALGORITHM TO CLUSTER HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX
    Juned, Vilzati
    Yusra
    COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, : 1 - 15