The Differential Effects of Multisensory Attentional Cues on Task Performance in VR Depending on the Level of Cognitive Load and Cognitive Capacity

被引:2
|
作者
Jeong, Sihyun [1 ]
Kim, Jinwook [1 ]
Lee, Jeongmi [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Daejeon, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Task analysis; Cognitive load; Visualization; Particle measurements; Atmospheric measurements; Search problems; Usability; Virtual Reality; Performance; Cognitive Load; Multisensory; Attentional Cue; Cognitive Capacity; WORKING-MEMORY; GAME; METAANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE; TACTILE; SEARCH; AGE;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372126
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
As the utilization of VR is expanding across diverse fields, research on devising attentional cues that could optimize users' task performance in VR has become crucial. Since the cognitive load imposed by the context and the individual's cognitive capacity are representative factors that are known to determine task performance, we aimed to examine how the effects of multisensory attentional cues on task performance are modulated by the two factors. For this purpose, we designed a new experimental paradigm in which participants engaged in dual (N-back, visual search) tasks under different levels of cognitive load while an attentional cue (visual, tactile, or visuotactile) was presented to facilitate search performance. The results showed that multi-sensory attentional cues are generally more effective than uni-sensory cues in enhancing task performance, but the benefit of multi-sensory cues changes according to the level of cognitive load and the individual's cognitive capacity; the amount of benefit increases as the cognitive load is higher and the cognitive capacity is lower. The findings of this study provide practical implications for designing attentional cues to enhance VR task performance, considering both the complexity of the VR context and users' internal characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:2703 / 2712
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sleep restriction and cognitive load affect performance on a simulated marksmanship task
    Smith, Carl D.
    Cooper, Adam D.
    Merullo, Donna J.
    Cohen, Bruce S.
    Heaton, Kristin J.
    Claro, Pedro J.
    Smith, Tracey
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03)
  • [42] Measuring cognitive load: performance, mental effort and simulation task complexity
    Haji, Faizal A.
    Rojas, David
    Childs, Ruth
    de Ribaupierre, Sandrine
    Dubrowski, Adam
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (08) : 815 - 827
  • [43] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A SECONDARY TASK AND LORAZEPAM ON COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE
    FILE, SE
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 6 (02) : 258 - 264
  • [44] The Effects of Cognitive Misfit on Students' Accounting Task Performance
    Honn, Darla D.
    Ugrin, Joseph C.
    ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2012, 27 (04): : 979 - 998
  • [45] The effects of social and cognitive cues on learning comprehension, eye-gaze pattern, and cognitive load in video instruction
    Jewoong Moon
    Jeeheon Ryu
    Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2021, 33 : 39 - 63
  • [46] The effects of social and cognitive cues on learning comprehension, eye-gaze pattern, and cognitive load in video instruction
    Moon, Jewoong
    Ryu, Jeeheon
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 33 (01) : 39 - 63
  • [47] Effects Of Cognitive Fatigue On Time-on-task Performance
    Head, James R.
    Tenan, Matthew S.
    Tweedell, Andrew
    Price, Thomas T.
    LaFiandra, Michael
    Helton, Deak
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 122 - 122
  • [48] The Effects of Distraction on Cognitive Task Performance During Toddlerhood
    Wyss, Nancy M.
    Kannass, Kathleen N.
    Haden, Catherine A.
    INFANCY, 2013, 18 (04) : 604 - 628
  • [49] THE EFFECTS OF NOISE AND SPEECH ON COGNITIVE TASK-PERFORMANCE
    BAKER, MA
    HOLDING, DH
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 120 (03): : 339 - 355
  • [50] COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN DIFFERENTIAL GSR CONDITIONING - EFFECTS OF A MASKING TASK
    FUHRER, MJ
    BAER, PE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 82 (02): : 168 - &