Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Trauma Patients Significantly Increase With Missed Prophylactic Enoxaparin Doses

被引:0
|
作者
Spradling, Jess [1 ]
Garfinkel, Sophia [1 ]
Edgecomb, Taylor [2 ]
Chapman, Alistair J. [3 ]
Pounders, Steffen [4 ]
Burns, Kelly [5 ]
Fisk, Chelsea S. [4 ]
Stowe, Alicia [6 ]
Hill, Emily [2 ]
Krech, Laura [4 ]
机构
[1] Butterworth Hosp, Corewell Hlth West, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[3] Corewell Hlth West, Butterworth Hosp, Div Chief, Acute Care Surg, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] Corewell Hlth West, Trauma Res Inst, 230 Michigan St,NE Suite 300,MC106, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[5] Corewell Hlth West, Trauma & Acute Care Surg, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[6] Corewell Hlth West, Scholarly Act & Sci Support, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
trauma; venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; enoxaparin; missed enoxaparin doses; deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism prophylaxis; witholding enoxaparin doses; BRAIN-INJURY; HEPARIN; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1177/00031348241269401
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current literature demonstrates prophylactic enoxaparin to be efficacious in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates without significantly increasing risk for bleeding complications. Despite this evidence, prophylactic enoxaparin doses are frequently withheld for surgery or procedures. This exploratory study aims to quantify the risk of a VTE event in trauma patients associated with missed doses of prophylactic enoxaparin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 31, 2021. A 1:1 propensity match with ten variables was performed to compare patients receiving prophylactic enoxaparin that had a VTE and those that did not. The primary outcome was a VTE event. Results: 493 patients met inclusion criteria; 1:1 propensity score matching was performed resulting in a cohort of 184 patients. The percentage of patients that missed a prophylactic enoxaparin dose in the VTE group was higher than the no VTE group (34.8% vs 21.7%, P = 0.049). This is consistent when examining total missed doses (P = 0.038) and consecutively missed doses (P = 0.035). The odds of having a VTE for patients that missed at least one dose or more of enoxaparin are nearly two times greater (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.997, 3.7). Conclusion: Missing enoxaparin doses significantly increases the risk of VTE in matched populations. Most prophylactic enoxaparin doses were held for procedures, and not for bleeding events. Trauma teams should carefully weigh the risk of bleeding complications associated with continuing enoxaparin prophylaxis against the significant thromboembolic risk of withholding it.
引用
收藏
页码:2265 / 2272
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Venous thromboembolism in multiple trauma patients
    Erstad, BL
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1998, 18 (05): : 1011 - 1023
  • [42] VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN HOSPITALIZED TRAUMA PATIENTS
    Yokota, Koshi
    Inoue, Akihiko
    Koga, Tokito
    Kai, Soichiro
    IJuin, Shinichi
    Kikuta, Shota
    Matsuyama, Shigenari
    Kawase, Tetsunori
    Ishihara, Satoshi
    Nakayama, Shinichi
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [43] Impact of Increased Enoxaparin Dosing on Anti-Xa Levels for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma Patients
    Bellfi, Lillian T.
    Zimmerman, S. Anthony
    Boudreau, Ryan
    Mosier, Willard, Jr.
    Smith, Alison
    Rueb, Nicole
    Hunt, John P.
    Stuke, Lance
    Greiffenstein, Patrick
    Schoen, Jonathan
    Marr, Alan
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (09) : 2158 - 2162
  • [44] A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLACTIC THERAPY FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM WITH DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE OR ENOXAPARIN
    Burbano-Levy, X.
    Herran, S.
    Sanchez, G.
    Mieth, K.
    Alfonso-Cristancho, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A535 - A535
  • [45] A survey of critical care pharmacists on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis dosing practices with enoxaparin in adult trauma patients
    McNeill, Sydney E.
    Alexander, Kaitlin M.
    Ladd, Kelsey
    Liu-DeRyke, Xi
    Smith, Chadwick
    Hobbs, Brandon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 6 (05): : 466 - 473
  • [46] MISSED CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS DOSES MATTER: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENTS
    Zangara, T.
    Coleman, J.
    Carmichael, H.
    Sauaia, A.
    Moore, E.
    Dunn, J.
    Schroeppel, T.
    Campion, E.
    Goodman, M.
    Floren, M.
    Ferrigno, L.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 68 : A157 - A158
  • [47] REASONS FOR MISSED DOSES OF PHARMACOLOGICAL VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) PROPHYLAXIS IN MEDICAL INPATIENTS
    Khan, Jahangir
    Subedi, Suresh K.
    Ahmed, Azza
    Mohammed, Abdul
    Kumar, Binay
    Kaatz, Scott
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : S384 - S384
  • [48] Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis at Community Hospitals: Cause for Alarm
    Lau, Brandyn D.
    Streiff, Michael B.
    Kraus, Peggy S.
    Hobson, Deborah B.
    Shaffer, Dauryne L.
    Aboagye, Jonathan K.
    Pronovost, Peter J.
    Haut, Elliott R.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (01) : 19 - 20
  • [49] Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis at Community Hospitals: Cause for Alarm
    Brandyn D. Lau
    Michael B. Streiff
    Peggy S. Kraus
    Deborah B. Hobson
    Dauryne L. Shaffer
    Jonathan K. Aboagye
    Peter J. Pronovost
    Elliott R. Haut
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 19 - 20
  • [50] Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial
    Droege, Molly Elizabeth
    Droege, Christopher Allen
    Philpott, Carolyn Dosen
    Webb, Megan Leslie
    Ernst, Neil Edward
    Athota, Krishna
    Wakefield, Devin
    Dowd, Joseph Richard
    Gomaa, Dina
    Robinson, Bryce H. R.
    Hanseman, Dennis
    Elterman, Joel
    Mueller, Eric William
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2021, 52 (04) : 1117 - 1128