Can a not-for-profit minority institutional investor affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Wen, Wen [1 ]
Qiao, Fei [2 ]
Feng, Jingli [3 ]
Hu, Huijie [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Int Business Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, 217 Jianshan St, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China Securities Investor Service Center (CSISC); tax avoidance; corporate governance; information environment; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1080/16081625.2024.2358077
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the impact of the China Securities Investor Service Center (CSISC), a not-for-profit minority institutional investor, on corporate tax avoidance. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model based on a sample of Chinese listed companies during 2014-2017, we find that CSISC shareholding reduces corporate tax avoidance. We check this finding's robustness using alternative measures of tax avoidance, alternative sampling, placebo tests, and parallel trend analysis, and our results still hold. In addition, we find the CSISC's negative impact on corporate tax avoidance is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), firms with worse internal and external corporate governance, and regions with stricter tax enforcement. Further analyses reveal that the improved information environment is a potential channel through which the CSISC inhibits corporate tax avoidance. This paper enriches the literature on the impact of minority shareholder protection mechanism and the determinants of corporate tax avoidance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can minority investor activism promote corporate risk-taking? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Chen, Shen
    Chen, Yuran
    Zhang, Di
    Wang, Jinmei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 85
  • [32] Do multiple large shareholders affect tax avoidance? Evidence from China
    Ouyang, Caiyue
    Xiong, Jiacai
    Huang, Kun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 67 : 207 - 224
  • [33] The Effect of Tax Avoidance on Firm Value-From the Perspective of Institutional Investor
    Xin-hua, Liu
    Qian, Cui
    Meng-ting, Fu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 3D INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION, 2015, 11 : 327 - 333
  • [34] The Impact of Investor Sentiment on Corporate Tax Avoidance from a Behavioral Finance Perspective
    Zhou, Xuanzheng
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024,
  • [35] Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Vietnamese Firms
    Oanh, Ha Kieu
    Gan, Christopher
    [J]. REVIEW OF PACIFIC BASIN FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2022, 25 (01)
  • [36] Does institutional ownership affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Zhou, Taiyun
    Liu, Mingxuan
    Zhang, Xiyu
    Qi, Zheng
    Qin, Ni
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 81 : 84 - 98
  • [37] Auditor tax expertise and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan
    Liu, Wu-Po
    Ma, Mengyu
    Liu, Zhenfeng
    So, Chun Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 34 (03): : 96 - 108
  • [38] Tax Avoidance, Tax Risk, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Korea
    Choi, Jihwan
    Park, Hyungju
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [39] Multiple Large Shareholders, Investment Efficiency and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from China
    Yu, Xiaohong
    Chen, Maonan
    Ye, Yujun
    [J]. PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2024, 33 (01): : 103 - 136
  • [40] Can retail investor activism inhibit corporate greenwashing behavior: Evidence from investor interactive platforms in China
    Zhang, Xiaoqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 461