Can a not-for-profit minority institutional investor affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Wen, Wen [1 ]
Qiao, Fei [2 ]
Feng, Jingli [3 ]
Hu, Huijie [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Int Business Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, 217 Jianshan St, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China Securities Investor Service Center (CSISC); tax avoidance; corporate governance; information environment; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1080/16081625.2024.2358077
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate the impact of the China Securities Investor Service Center (CSISC), a not-for-profit minority institutional investor, on corporate tax avoidance. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) model based on a sample of Chinese listed companies during 2014-2017, we find that CSISC shareholding reduces corporate tax avoidance. We check this finding's robustness using alternative measures of tax avoidance, alternative sampling, placebo tests, and parallel trend analysis, and our results still hold. In addition, we find the CSISC's negative impact on corporate tax avoidance is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises (SOEs), firms with worse internal and external corporate governance, and regions with stricter tax enforcement. Further analyses reveal that the improved information environment is a potential channel through which the CSISC inhibits corporate tax avoidance. This paper enriches the literature on the impact of minority shareholder protection mechanism and the determinants of corporate tax avoidance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can a not-for-profit minority institutional shareholder impede stock price crash risk: Evidence from China
    Hu, Yi
    Jin, Shuchang
    Gu, Qiankun
    Tang, Ziling
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
  • [2] Does ESG performance affect corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from China
    Jiang, Hongli
    Hu, Wenjie
    Jiang, Pengcheng
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 61
  • [3] Can a not-for-profit minority institutional shareholder make a big difference in corporate governance? A quasi-natural experiment
    Ge, Wenxia
    Ouyang, Caiyue
    Shi, Zhenyang
    Chen, Zhanliao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 72
  • [4] Institutional Ownership and Corporate Tax Avoidance: New Evidence
    Khan, Mozaffar
    Srinivasan, Suraj
    Tan, Liang
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (02): : 101 - 122
  • [5] Corporate digital transformation and tax avoidance: evidence from China
    Chen, Meian
    Zhao, Ke
    Jin, Wei
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 85
  • [6] Corporate Tax Avoidance and Geographic Distance: Evidence From China
    Chan, Kalok
    Wang, Xiaowei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2023,
  • [7] Supervision of not-for-profit minority institutional shareholder and the cost of equity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Zhang, Zixi
    Cheng, Xiaoke
    Cheng, Hanxiu
    Sun, Qian
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 63
  • [8] Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance-Evidence from China
    Yang, Xiaokang
    Xu, Junbing
    Zhu, Minling
    Yang, Yinglong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [9] Short selling threat and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China
    Tian, Gaoliang
    Li, Xing
    Xue, Fujing
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40 (03): : 579 - 592
  • [10] Local gambling preferences and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China
    Yin, Hongying
    Gong, Xiaoyun
    Quan, Xiaofeng
    Li, Annie Y. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2024, 29 (03) : 3413 - 3443