The role of agroforestry systems for addressing climate change livelihood vulnerability of farmers of Northwestern Ethiopia

被引:0
|
作者
Tebkew, Mekuanent [1 ]
Asfaw, Zebene [2 ]
Worku, Adefires [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gondar, Dept Forestry, Gondar, Ethiopia
[2] Hawassa Univ, Wondo Genet Coll Forestry & Nat Resources, Hawassa, Ethiopia
[3] Forest Sect Dev, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Adaptive capacity; Biodiversity; Climate variability; Households; Livelihood vulnerability index; TREES; FOOD; CHALLENGES; DIVERSITY; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36196
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Farmers in Ethiopia have been vulnerable to climate change in recent decades. In the face of this change, farmers have managed agroforestry systems to maintain their livelihoods. However, studies exploring the role of agroforestry in reducing household vulnerability are lacking in Northwestern Ethiopia. The objectives of the study were to (i) investigate households' livelihoods vulnerability to climate change in Northwestern Ethiopia; (iii) assess the role of agroforestry in mitigating the negative impacts of climate change on farmers livelihoods. Key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, household surveys (387), and focus group discussions were used to collect the data. Descriptive statistics, principal component analysis, the X2-test, and the t-test were run to analyze the data. The findings revealed that households are vulnerable to rising temperatures, rainfall variability, frost, disease and pests, erosion, hailstorms, price hikes, wildlife damage to crops, and health stress. Agroforestry non-practitioners had a higher livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) (0.42 +/- 0.081) than practitioners (0.46 +/- 0.079). The Livelihood Vulnerability-Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Index (LVI-IPCC) showed that AF nonpractitioners had a higher exposure (0.58), sensitivity (0.54) index, and a lower adaptive capacity index (0.44) than the exposure (0.34), sensitivity (0.38), and adaptive capacity index (0.51) of practitioners. Plant diversity, income level and diversity, livelihood activities, social network, and food security status of farmers were improved by agroforestry. Farmers were therefore less susceptible to adverse climate shocks. Thus, the AF system could be part of future adaptation and resilience programs that provide dependable tools to minimize households' vulnerability to climate shocks. However, management guidelines, such as understanding local ecosystems, setting clear objectives, choosing suitable species, planning for diversity, considering the market, and regular maintenance and monitoring, are needed for agroforestry to improve its contribution.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic vulnerability of smallholder agricultural systems in the face of climate change for Ethiopia
    Shukla, Roopam
    Gleixner, Stephanie
    Yalew, Amsalu Woldie
    Schauberger, Bernhard
    Sietz, Diana
    Gornott, Christoph
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (04)
  • [32] Financial analysis of agroforestry land uses and its implications for smallholder farmers livelihood improvement in Ethiopia
    Lalisa Alemayehu Duguma
    Agroforestry Systems, 2013, 87 : 217 - 231
  • [33] Financial analysis of agroforestry land uses and its implications for smallholder farmers livelihood improvement in Ethiopia
    Duguma, Lalisa Alemayehu
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2013, 87 (01) : 217 - 231
  • [34] Smallholder farmers' vulnerability and adaptation to climate change induced shocks: The case of Northern Ethiopia highlands
    Tofu, Daniel Assefa
    Woldeamanuel, Teshale
    Haile, Firafis
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 8
  • [35] Vulnerability of Smallholder Farmers to Climate Change-Induced Shocks in East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia
    Zeleke, Titay
    Beyene, Fekadu
    Deressa, Temesgen
    Yousuf, Jemal
    Kebede, Temesgen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 19
  • [36] Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Livelihood Systems: Conceptual Challenges and Interdisciplinary Solutions
    Fraser, Evan D. G.
    Dougill, Andrew J.
    Hubacek, Klaus
    Quinn, Claire H.
    Sendzimir, Jan
    Termansen, Mette
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2011, 16 (03): : 01
  • [37] Smallholder farmers' livelihood vulnerability to climate change-induced hazards: agroecology-based comparative analysis in Northcentral Ethiopia (Woleka Sub-basin)
    Asfaw, Amogne
    Bantider, Amare
    Simane, Belay
    Hassen, Ali
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [38] Livelihood vulnerability of smallholder farmers to climate change: A comparative analysis based on irrigation access in South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    ARIFAH
    Darmawan SALMAN
    Amir YASSI
    Eymal Bahsar DEMMALLINO
    Regional Sustainability, 2022, 3 (03) : 244 - 253
  • [39] Farmers’ perception of climate change and livelihood vulnerability: a comparative study of Bundelkhand and Central regions of Uttar Pradesh, India
    Surendra Singh Jatav
    Discover Sustainability, 5
  • [40] Study on Livelihood Vulnerability and Adaptation Strategies of Farmers in Areas Threatened by Different Disaster Types under Climate Change
    Yang, Xue
    Guo, Shili
    Deng, Xin
    Wang, Wei
    Xu, Dingde
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (11):