HPV self-sampling in organized cervical cancer screening program: A randomized pilot study in Estonia in 2021

被引:0
|
作者
Hallik, Reeli [1 ,2 ]
Innos, Kaire [2 ]
Janes, Jaak [2 ]
Joers, Kai [3 ]
Ratnik, Kaspar [4 ,5 ]
Veerus, Piret [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Clin Med, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Natl Inst Hlth Dev, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Paldiski mnt 80, EE-10617 Tallinn, Estonia
[3] Tartu Univ Hosp, United Labs, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Synlab Estonia, Tallinn, Estonia
[5] Univ Tartu, Inst Biomed & Translat Med, Tartu, Estonia
[6] West Tallinn Cent Hosp, Womens Clin, Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Cervical cancer; screening; self-sampling; opt-in and opt-out strategies; WOMEN; KITS;
D O I
10.1177/09691413241268819
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Cervical cancer incidence in Estonia ranks among the highest in Europe, but screening attendance has remained low. This randomized study aimed to evaluate the impact of opt-in and opt-out human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling options on participation in organized screening.Methods A random sample of 25,591 women were drawn from the cervical cancer screening target population who were due to receive a reminder in autumn 2021 and thereafter randomly allocated to two equally sized intervention arms (opt-out and opt-in) receiving a choice between HPV self-sampling or clinician sampling. In the opt-out arm, a self-sampler was sent to home address by regular mail; the opt-in arm received an e-mail containing a link to order a self-sampler online. The remaining 30,102 women in the control group received a standard reminder for conventional screening. Participation by intervention arm, age and region of residence was calculated; a questionnaire was used to assess self-sampling user experience.Results A significant difference in participation was seen between opt-out (41.7%) (19.8% chose self-sampling and 21.9% clinician sampling), opt-in (34.1%) (7.9% self-sampling, 26.2% clinician sampling) and control group (29.0%, clinician sampling only). All age groups and regions in the intervention arms showed higher participation compared to the control group, but the size of the effect varied. Among self-sampling users, 99% agreed that the device was easy to use and only 3.5% preferred future testing at the clinic.Conclusion Providing women with a choice between self-sampling and clinician sampling significantly increased participation in cervical cancer screening. Opt-in and opt-out options had a different effect across age groups, suggesting the need to adapt strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective pilot evaluation of vaginal and urine self-sampling for the Roche cobas 4800 HPV test for cervical cancer screening
    Sang-Hyun Hwang
    Hye Young Shin
    Dong Ock Lee
    Na Young Sung
    Bomyee Lee
    Do-Hoon Lee
    Jae Kwan Jun
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [32] A prospective pilot evaluation of vaginal and urine self-sampling for the Roche cobas 4800 HPV test for cervical cancer screening
    Hwang, Sang-Hyun
    Shin, Hye Young
    Lee, Dong Ock
    Sung, Na Young
    Lee, Bomyee
    Lee, Do-Hoon
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [33] Experience from HPV self-sampling as part of a population based cervical cancer screening program in the region of Stockholm, Sweden
    Elfgren, Kristina
    Vikstrom, Malin
    Ohman, Daniel
    Lannervall, Katarina
    Lundstrom, Viveka
    Elfstrom, Miriam
    Dillner, Joakim
    Roos, Nathalie
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 : 88 - 88
  • [34] Evaluation of the self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
    Gustavo Allende
    Pedro Surriabre
    Leyddy Cáceres
    Diego Bellot
    Neli Ovando
    Andrea Torrico
    Pamela Calle
    Carla Ascarrunz
    Sophie Alexander
    Michel Bossens
    Véronique Fontaine
    Patricia Rodríguez
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 19
  • [35] A randomized trial of mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women in South Florida
    Erin Kobetz
    Julia Seay
    Tulay Koru-Sengul
    Jordan Baeker Bispo
    Dinah Trevil
    Martha Gonzalez
    Andrew Brickman
    Olveen Carrasquillo
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2018, 29 : 793 - 801
  • [36] A randomized trial of mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women in South Florida
    Kobetz, Erin
    Seay, Julia
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Bispo, Jordan Baeker
    Trevil, Dinah
    Gonzalez, Martha
    Brickman, Andrew
    Carrasquillo, Olveen
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (09) : 793 - 801
  • [37] HPV-based cervical cancer screening, including self-sampling, versus screening with cytology in Argentina
    Arbyn, Marc
    de Sanjose, Silvia
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 7 (06): : E688 - E689
  • [38] Self-sampling for primary cervical cancer screening, Brazil
    不详
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2007, 15 (29) : 223 - 223
  • [39] Evaluation of the self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
    Allende, Gustavo
    Surriabre, Pedro
    Caceres, Leyddy
    Bellot, Diego
    Ovando, Neli
    Torrico, Andrea
    Calle, Pamela
    Ascarrunz, Carla
    Alexander, Sophie
    Bossens, Michel
    Fontaine, Veronique
    Rodriguez, Patricia
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [40] Use of HPV self-sampling to increase screening for cervical cancer in indigenous and rural communities in Guatemala
    Gottschlich, Anna
    Murchland, Audrey
    Bevilacqua, Kristin
    Pineda, Andres
    Rivera-Andrade, Alvaro
    Alvarez, Christian
    Ogilvie, Gina
    Mendoza-Montano, Carlos
    Meza, Rafael
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (02)