Comparing the effects of Bone+B® xenograft and InterOss® xenograft bone material on rabbit calvaria bone defect regeneration

被引:0
|
作者
Naini, Afshin Yadegari [1 ]
Kobravi, Sepehr [2 ,6 ]
Jafari, Aida [1 ]
Lotfalizadeh, Mohammadhassan [3 ]
Lotfalizadeh, Narges [4 ]
Farhadi, Sareh [5 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Azad Univ, Fac Dent Khorasgan, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tehran Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] North Khorasan Univ Med Sci, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Bojnurd, Iran
[4] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Mashhad, Iran
[5] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Pathol, Tehran Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[6] Isfahan Azad Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tehran Med Sci, Esfahan, Iran
来源
关键词
bone regeneration; calvarium; rabbit; xenograft; PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION; GRAFTING MATERIAL; MAXILLARY; AUGMENTATION; SUBSTITUTE; BIO-OSS(R); IMPLANTS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.875
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The bone regeneration therapy is often used in patients with inadequate bone support for implants, particularly following tooth extractions. Xenografts derived from animal tissues are effective bone reconstructive options that resist resorption and pose a low risk of transmitting disease. Therefore, these implants may be a good option for enhancing and stabilizing maxillary sinuses. The purpose of this study was to compare two xenografts, Bone(+)B (R) and InterOss (R), for the reconstruction of rabbit calvaria defects. Methods and Materials: The study involved seven male New Zealand white rabbits. In the surgical procedure, 21 spots were created on both sides of the midline calvarium by creating three 8-millimeter defects. A control group was used, as well as two treatment groups utilizing Bone(+)B (R) Grafts and InterOss (R) Grafts. After 3 months, the rabbits were euthanized, followed by pathological evaluation. Analysis of these samples focused on bone formation, xenograft remaining material, and inflammation levels, using Adobe Photoshop CS 8.0 and SPSS version 24. Results: With the application of Bone(+)B (R) graft, bone formation ranged from 32% to 45%, with a mean of 37.80% (+/- 5.63), and the remaining material ranged from 28% to 37%, with a mean of 32.60% (+/- 3.65). Using InterOss (R) grafts, bone formation was 61% to 75%, the mean was 65.83% (+/- 4.75), and the remaining material was 9% to 18%, with a mean of 13.17% (+/- 3.06). The bone formation in the control group ranged from 10% to 25%, with a mean of 17.17% (+/- 6.11). InterOss (R) had lower inflammation levels than other groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). Conclusion: InterOss (R) bone powder is the best option for maxillofacial surgery and bone reconstruction. This is due to more bone formation, less remaining material, and a lower inflammation level. Compared to the control group, Bone(+)B (R) improves healing and bone quality, thus making it an alternative to InterOss (R).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of tibial defect and bone nonunion with limb shortening with external fixator and reconstituted bone xenograft
    王志刚
    刘建
    胡蕴玉
    孟国林
    金格勒
    袁志
    王海强
    戴先文
    Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 2003, (02)
  • [22] Effects of systemic erythropoietin treatment and heterogeneous xenograft in combination on bone regeneration of a critical-size defect in an experimental model
    Diker, Nurettin
    Sarican, Hande
    Cumbul, Alev
    Kilic, Ertugrul
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (11) : 1919 - 1923
  • [23] Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model
    Lee, Yu-Chieh
    Chan, Ya-Hui
    Hsieh, Sung-Chih
    Lew, Wei-Zhen
    Feng, Sheng-Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (20)
  • [24] Evaluation of New Octacalcium Phosphate-Coated Xenograft in Rats Calvarial Defect Model on Bone Regeneration
    Jung, Yoona
    Kim, Won-Hyeon
    Lee, Sung-Ho
    Ju, Kyung Won
    Jang, Eun-Hee
    Kim, Sung-O
    Kim, Bongju
    Lee, Jong-Ho
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (19) : 1 - 11
  • [25] The bone-healing effect of a xenograft in a rat calvarial defect model
    Develioglu, Hakan
    Saraydin, Serpil Unver
    Kartal, Unal
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2009, 28 (04) : 396 - 400
  • [26] Experimental comparison of bovine-derived xenograft, xenograft-autologous bone marrow and autogenous bone graft for the treatment of bony defects in the rabbit ulna
    Keskin, Davut
    Guendogdu, Cemal
    Atac, Alpaslan Cevdet
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2007, 16 (04) : 299 - 305
  • [27] Bone regeneration capacities of alveolar bone mesenchymal stem cells sheet in rabbit calvarial bone defect
    Liu, Yanan
    Wang, Haifeng
    Dou, Huixin
    Tian, Bin
    Li, Le
    Jin, Luyuan
    Zhang, Zhenting
    Hu, Lei
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2020, 11
  • [28] Caprine demineralized bone matrix (DBMc) in the repair of non-critical bone defects in rabbit tibias. A new bone xenograft
    dos Santos, Felipe Rocha
    Minto, Bruno Watanabe
    Goiana da Silva, Sidney Wendell
    Coelho, Livia de Paula
    Rossignoli, Pedro Paulo
    Costa Junior, Jose Sergio
    Taba Junior, Mario
    Gosuen Goncalves Dias, Luis Gustavo
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 35 (08) : 1 - 9
  • [29] Histopathological Comparison between Bone Marrow and Periodontium-derived Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration in Rabbit Calvaria
    Kadkhoda, Z.
    Safarpour, A.
    Azmoodeh, F.
    Adibi, S.
    Khoshzaban, A.
    Bahrami, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION MEDICINE, 2016, 7 (01): : 9 - 18
  • [30] The effect of bovine demineralized bone matrix on regeneration of rabbit parietal bone defect.
    Aghazadeh, S.
    Azimi, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 15 : 36 - 36