Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in Patients With Severe Renal Impairment: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Study

被引:3
|
作者
Oh, Matthew W. [1 ]
Mohapatra, Shweta G. [1 ]
Pak, Taylor [1 ]
Hermawan, Aundree [1 ]
Chen, Chieh-An [1 ]
Thota, Bhavana [1 ]
Chen, Joy [1 ]
Siu, Eric [1 ]
Park, Jenny [2 ]
Moon, Tiffany S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Biostat, Dallas, TX USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2024年 / 138卷 / 05期
关键词
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; ROCURONIUM; EFFICACY; SAFETY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006807
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is not advised for patients with severe renal impairment, but has been shown in a variety of other populations to be superior to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The objective of this study was to determine if reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus reversal of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine results in a faster return to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) >= 90% in patients with severe renal impairment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial at a large county hospital. A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included patients age >= 18, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III and IV, with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, undergoing general anesthesia with expected surgical duration >= 2 hours and necessitating neuromuscular blockade. Subjects received either cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia to facilitate tracheal intubation. Subjects were kept at moderate neuromuscular blockade during surgery and received either 2 mg/kg sugammadex or 50 <mu>g/kg neostigmine with 10 mu g/kg glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with electromyography (TwitchView), and the TOFR was recorded every minute after administration of the reversal agent. The time from administration of neuromuscular reversal until the patient reached a TOFR >= 90% was recorded as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean time to recovery of TOFR >= 90% was significantly faster with sugammadex at 3.5 (+/- 1.6) min compared with neostigmine at 14.8 (+/- 6.1) min (P < .0001; mean difference, 11.3 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-13.5 minutes). There were no major adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe renal impairment, neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium followed by reversal with sugammadex provides a significantly faster return of neuromuscular function compared to cisatracurium and neostigmine, without any major adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1051
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Postoperative Risk of Transfusion After Reversal of Residual Neuromuscular Block With Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Schmidt, Marc T.
    Paredes, Stephania
    Rossler, Julian
    Mukhia, Rupashi
    Pu, Xuan
    Mao, Guangmei
    Turan, Alparslan
    Ruetzler, Kurt
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 (04): : 745 - 752
  • [32] Ibutilide versus amiodarone in atrial fibrillation: A double-blinded, randomized study
    Bernard, EO
    Schmid, ER
    Schmidlin, D
    Scharf, C
    Candinas, R
    Germann, R
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (04) : 1031 - 1034
  • [33] A retrospective study of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in critically ill patients in the ICU
    Răzvan Bologheanu
    Paul Lichtenegger
    Mathias Maleczek
    Daniel Laxar
    Eva Schaden
    Oliver Kimberger
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [34] Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Effects on Reintubation for Respiratory Failure or Newly Initiated Noninvasive Ventilation: An Interrupted Time Series Design
    Krause, Martin
    McWilliams, Shannon K.
    Bullard, Kenneth J.
    Mayes, Lena M.
    Jameson, Leslie C.
    Mikulich-Gilbertson, Susan K.
    Fernandez-Bustamante, Ana
    Bartels, Karsten
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 131 (01): : 141 - 151
  • [35] A retrospective study of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in critically ill patients in the ICU
    Bologheanu, Razvan
    Lichtenegger, Paul
    Maleczek, Mathias
    Laxar, Daniel
    Schaden, Eva
    Kimberger, Oliver
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [36] Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Jia-Feng
    Zhao, Zhen-Zhen
    Jiang, Zheng-Yu
    Liu, Hui-Xing
    Deng, Xiao-Ming
    PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [37] Influence of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jia-Feng Wang
    Zhen-Zhen Zhao
    Zheng-Yu Jiang
    Hui-Xing Liu
    Xiao-Ming Deng
    Perioperative Medicine, 10
  • [38] Prospective study of residual neuromuscular block and postoperative respiratory complications in patients reversed with neostigmine versus sugammadex
    Martinez-Ubieto, Javier
    Ortega-Lucea, Sonia
    Pascual-Belosta, Ana
    Arazo-Iglesias, Ivan
    Gil-Bona, Jesus
    Jimenez-Bernardo, Teresa
    Munoz-Rodriguez, Luis
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2016, 82 (07) : 735 - 742
  • [39] Neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex versus pyridostigmine/glycopyrrolate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial of effects on postoperative gastrointestinal motility
    An, Jihyun
    Noh, Heeyun
    Kim, Eunju
    Lee, Jihyang
    Woo, Kyeongyoon
    Kim, Hyunkyum
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 73 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [40] The evaluation of the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with neostigmine on postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study
    Arafa, Mohamed S.
    Ahmed, Hassan Mohamed
    Elnabawy, Abdelrahman Bakr
    Kassem, Sara Farouk
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)