Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review

被引:1
|
作者
Salas, D. A. [1 ]
Boero, A. J. [1 ]
Ramirez, A. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Escuela Super Politecn Litoral, Fac Mech Engn & Prod Sci, Campus Gustavo Galindo,Km 30-5 Via Perimetral, Guayaquil 090902, Ecuador
来源
关键词
BECCS; Geological storage; Bioenergy; Land use; LCA; Carbon capture; LAND-USE CHANGE; OF-THE-ART; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; CO2; LEAKAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSES; VEHICLE TRANSPORT; POWER-PLANTS; GAS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114458
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research aims to explore the current evidence on the sustainability of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage under a life cycle approach and to understand how research on this topic has evolved in the last decade. A systematic literature review was performed, and the main focus was identifying methodological shortcomings and analysing Global Warming Potential results. Forty-seven studies were selected for in-depth revision. Results show that the number of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on BECCS has increased in the last couple of years and that most of these studies report near-carbon neutral or carbon-negative results for electricity, biofuel energy, and other products. However, in many cases, some aspects have been omitted from the discussion, such as proper accounting of land use impacts, impact allocation procedure, accounting of leakage from storage sites, and impacts related to carbon utilisation. Despite this methodological variability, Global Warming Potential results are mostly carbon-negative and carbon-neutral for both power BECCS and industrial BECCS systems. Consequently, current scientific evidence suggests climate change mitigation benefits from BECCS despite methodological variability. However, it is still insufficient to reach a consensus on the sustainability of this technology as a solution for a global energy transition. It is recommended that further LCA research deals carefully with methodological and product systems variability, which may affect environmental impact results. Moreover, carbon capture approaches with high potential benefits should be further analysed, and the most optimal BECCS typologies should be identified. Finally, additional life cycle impact categories should be reported, along with the assessment of the economic and social dimensions of BECCS.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization
    Mueller, Leonard Jan
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    Bachmann, Marvin
    Zimmermann, Arno
    Sternberg, Andre
    Bardow, Andre
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8
  • [22] Meta-Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies on Electricity Generation with Carbon Capture and Storage
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Zapp, Petra
    Marx, Josefine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S155 - S168
  • [23] Comparative life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing plants with carbon capture and storage
    Schakel, Wouter
    Meerman, Hans
    Talaei, Alireza
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Faaij, Andre
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 131 : 441 - 467
  • [24] Life cycle and cost assessment of mineral carbonation for carbon capture and storage in European power generation
    Giannoulakis, Stylianos
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 21 : 140 - 157
  • [25] Potential and challenges of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage as a carbon-negative energy source: A review
    Babin, Alexandre
    Vaneeckhaute, Celine
    Iliuta, Maria C.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2021, 146
  • [26] Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of the integration of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the polygeneration system (BECCS-PS) for producing green electricity and methanol
    Pratama, Muhammad Raihan
    Muthia, Rahma
    Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu
    [J]. CARBON NEUTRALITY, 2023, 2 (01):
  • [27] Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) potential in jet fuel production from forestry residues: A combined Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Michaga, Maria Fernanda Rojas
    Michailos, Stavros
    Akram, Muhammad
    Cardozo, Evelyn
    Hughes, Kevin J.
    Ingham, Derek
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 255
  • [28] The hotspots of life cycle assessment for bioenergy: A review by social network analysis
    Li, Jiao
    Wang, Yuan
    Yan, Beibei
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 1301 - 1308
  • [29] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413