Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: A review

被引:1
|
作者
Salas, D. A. [1 ]
Boero, A. J. [1 ]
Ramirez, A. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Escuela Super Politecn Litoral, Fac Mech Engn & Prod Sci, Campus Gustavo Galindo,Km 30-5 Via Perimetral, Guayaquil 090902, Ecuador
来源
关键词
BECCS; Geological storage; Bioenergy; Land use; LCA; Carbon capture; LAND-USE CHANGE; OF-THE-ART; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; CO2; LEAKAGE; ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSES; VEHICLE TRANSPORT; POWER-PLANTS; GAS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2024.114458
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research aims to explore the current evidence on the sustainability of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage under a life cycle approach and to understand how research on this topic has evolved in the last decade. A systematic literature review was performed, and the main focus was identifying methodological shortcomings and analysing Global Warming Potential results. Forty-seven studies were selected for in-depth revision. Results show that the number of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on BECCS has increased in the last couple of years and that most of these studies report near-carbon neutral or carbon-negative results for electricity, biofuel energy, and other products. However, in many cases, some aspects have been omitted from the discussion, such as proper accounting of land use impacts, impact allocation procedure, accounting of leakage from storage sites, and impacts related to carbon utilisation. Despite this methodological variability, Global Warming Potential results are mostly carbon-negative and carbon-neutral for both power BECCS and industrial BECCS systems. Consequently, current scientific evidence suggests climate change mitigation benefits from BECCS despite methodological variability. However, it is still insufficient to reach a consensus on the sustainability of this technology as a solution for a global energy transition. It is recommended that further LCA research deals carefully with methodological and product systems variability, which may affect environmental impact results. Moreover, carbon capture approaches with high potential benefits should be further analysed, and the most optimal BECCS typologies should be identified. Finally, additional life cycle impact categories should be reported, along with the assessment of the economic and social dimensions of BECCS.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage systems: Critical review of life cycle inventories
    Duval-Dachary, S.
    Beauchet, S.
    Lorne, D.
    Salou, T.
    Helias, A.
    Pastor, A.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 183
  • [2] Can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage deliver negative emissions? A critical review of life cycle assessment
    Wang, Junyao
    Zheng, Yawen
    He, Song
    Yan, Jiahui
    Zeng, Xuelan
    Li, Shuangjun
    Tian, Zhipeng
    Lei, Libin
    Chen, Yin
    Deng, Shuai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [3] Life cycle analysis of power cycle configurations in bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
    Bennett, Jeffrey A.
    Melara, A. Jasmin
    Colosi, Lisa M.
    Clarens, Andres F.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 340 - 345
  • [4] Life cycle meta-analysis of carbon capture pathways in power plants: Implications for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
    Bennett, Jeffrey A.
    Abotalib, Mohammad
    Zhao, Fu
    Clarens, Andres F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2021, 111
  • [5] Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Brazil: A Review
    Silveira, Brenda H. M.
    Costa, Hirdan K. M.
    Santos, Edmilson M.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of membrane-based carbon capture and storage
    Troy, Stefanie
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Zapp, Petra
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1641 - 1654
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of membrane-based carbon capture and storage
    Stefanie Troy
    Andrea Schreiber
    Petra Zapp
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 1641 - 1654
  • [8] Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS): Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electricity generated from palm oil wastes
    Saharudin, Djasmine Mastisya
    Jeswani, Harish Kumar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 349
  • [9] Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Coal-fired Power Plants with Carbon Capture and Storage
    Zhang, Jingheng
    Basson, Lauren
    Leach, Matthew
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE POWER GENERATION AND SUPPLY, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2108 - +
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe
    Volkart, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christian
    Boulet, Celine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 16 : 91 - 106