A comparison study of two implemented fuzzy-based models for decision of logical trust

被引:1
|
作者
Higashi, Shunya [1 ]
Ampririt, Phudit [1 ]
Qafzezi, Ermioni [2 ]
Ikeda, Makoto [2 ]
Matsuo, Keita [2 ]
Barolli, Leonard [2 ]
机构
[1] Fukuoka Inst Technol, Grad Sch Engn, 3-30-1 Wajiro Higashi,Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8110295, Japan
[2] Fukuoka Inst Technol, Dept Informat & Commun Engn, 3-30-1 Wajiro Higashi,Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8110295, Japan
关键词
Trust computing; fuzzy logic; intelligent algorithms; decision making systems; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3233/JHS-230189
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In recent years, the human-to-human and human-to-things relationships are becoming complicated and unreliable, which makes harder decisions in a variety of situations. As a result, trust computing is gaining interest in a number of research fields. The Logical Trust (LT) is one of trust computing concepts. In this paper, we design a Fuzzy-based System for Decision of Logical Trust (FSDLT). We implement two models: FSDLTM1 and FSDLTM2. The FSDLTM1 considers three input parameters: Belief (Be), Experience (Ep), Rationality (Ra) and the output parameter is LT. In FSDLTM2, we consider Reliability (Re) as a new parameter. We evaluated the implemented models by computer simulations. The simulation results show that when Be, Ep, Ra and Re are increasing, the LT is increased. For FSDLTM1, when Ep value is 0.9, all LT values are greater than 0.5. While for FSDLTM2, in case when Be is 0.9, for all values of Ra and Re, when Ep is 0.5 and 0.9, all LT values are higher than 0.5. This shows that the person or device is trustworthy. The FSDLTM2 is more complex than FSALTM1 but it makes a better decision for LT by considering four input parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 295
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Fuzzy-based Decision Support Tool for Engineering Curriculum Design
    Bologa, O.
    Breaz, R. E.
    Racz, S. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2015, 10 (06) : 803 - 811
  • [32] A fuzzy-based ontology for Alzheimer's disease decision support
    Zekri, Firas
    Bouaziz, Rafik
    Turki, Emna
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [33] Modeling of fuzzy-based voice of customer for business decision analytics
    Aguwa, Celestine
    Olya, Mohammad Hessam
    Monplaisir, Leslie
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 125 : 136 - 145
  • [34] A fuzzy-based decision-support model for rebuy procurement
    Chen, Chien-Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 122 (02) : 714 - 724
  • [35] A Fuzzy-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Coeliac Disease
    Tabacchi, M. E.
    Tegolo, D.
    Cascio, D.
    Valenti, C.
    Sorce, S.
    Gentile, V
    Taormina, V
    Brusca, I
    Magazzu, G.
    Giuliano, A.
    Raso, G.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 102223 - 102236
  • [36] A fuzzy-based supply chain management decision support system
    Liang, H
    Wu, Z
    Wu, QD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2002, : 2617 - 2621
  • [37] A fuzzy-based decision making procedure for machine selection problem
    Ozceylan, Eren
    Kabak, Mehmet
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (03) : 1841 - 1856
  • [38] Logical management:: Fuzzy logic integrated models for decision making in enterprises
    Espin, R
    Gómez, JM
    Hernández, M
    Lecich, MI
    SOFT COMPUTING WITH INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, VOL 17, 2004, 17 : 369 - 378
  • [39] A Comparison Study of Two Fuzzy-based Handover Systems for Avoiding Ping-Pong Effect in Wireless Cellular Networks
    Mino, Gjergji
    Barolli, Leonard
    Durresi, Arjan
    Xhafa, Fatos
    Koyama, Akio
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK-BASED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2009, : 564 - +
  • [40] Coordination and management of cloud, fog and edge resources in SDN-VANETs using fuzzy logic: A comparison study for two fuzzy-based systems
    Qafzezi, Ermioni
    Bylykbashi, Kevin
    Ikeda, Makoto
    Matsuo, Keita
    Barolli, Leonard
    INTERNET OF THINGS, 2020, 11