Predictors for selection of outpatient single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Soputro, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya S. [1 ]
Pedraza, Adriana M. [1 ]
Mikesell, Carter D. [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland Hts, OH USA
关键词
radical prostatectomy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; prostate cancer; single port; robotic surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; COMORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.16483
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the different perioperative variables that may serve as important clinical predictors when selecting patients for outpatient single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP).Patients and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on the Institutional Review Board-approved, prospectively maintained database to identify 485 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between 2018 and 2023. A comparison analysis was performed on patients who were managed as outpatients vs inpatients following their respective SP-RARP. A separate analysis was performed after excluding patients with pre-planned admissions to identify the risk factors for unplanned admissions.ResultsAll procedures were successfully completed without any conversion or additional ports. After excluding patients with pre-planned admissions, outpatient SP-RARP was successfully achieved in 86.6% with a median (interquartile range) length of stay of 4.6 (3.8-6.1) hours. Our multivariate regression analysis identified cardiac comorbidity and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as predictors of outpatient SP-RARP. In addition, the absence of cardiac comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, and lower postoperative pain score were protective against the risk of unplanned admission. Furthermore, both inpatient and outpatient encounters had comparable 90-day rates of postoperative complication (P = 0.136) and hospital re-admission (P = 0.942).ConclusionOutpatient management models could be successfully achieved in most patients who underwent SP-RARP (86.6%) while maintaining similarly low perioperative morbidity profile. Nevertheless, appropriate patient selection based on the baseline clinicodemographic characteristics remains essential to ensure the safety and ongoing success of outpatient SP-RARP.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SINGLE-PORT ROBOT-ASSISTED PERINEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY USING THE SP SURGICAL SYSTEM
    Kim, Soodong
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E181 - E182
  • [32] Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Kang, San
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Shin, Dongho
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Kim, Sae Woong
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [33] Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: First Clinical Experience Using The SP Surgical System
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Eltemamy, Mohamed
    Garisto, Juan
    UROLOGY, 2019, 124 : 309 - 309
  • [34] Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fahmy, Omar
    Fahmy, Usama A.
    Alhakamy, Nabil A.
    Khairul-Asri, Mohd Ghani
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (24)
  • [35] Outpatient Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Garisto, Juan D.
    Yau, Roger
    Eltemamy, Mohamed
    Kim, Soodong
    Lenfant, Louis
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2020, 144 : 142 - 146
  • [36] Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Simon, Ross M.
    Howard, Lauren E.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Terris, Martha K.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Aronson, William J.
    Amling, Christopher L.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 618 - 623
  • [37] Low Risk of Postoperative Hernia Following Single-port Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Report From the Single-port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC)
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Calvo, Ruben Sauer
    Nguyen, Jennifer
    Moschovas, Marcio C.
    Wilder, Samantha
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    De La Rosa, Ruth Sanchez
    Saini, Indu
    Peabody, James
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Rogers, Craig
    Joseph, Jean
    Patel, Vipul
    Stifelman, Michael
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Kim, Moses
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2023, 180 : 151 - 159
  • [38] COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND STANDARD ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AT A LARGE-VOLUME CENTER
    Huang, Mitchell M.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Su, Zhuo T.
    Wainger, Julia J.
    Han, Misop
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E35 - E36
  • [39] Single-port versus multi-port: will "one for all" ever become a new standard for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Cipriani, Chiara
    Garisto, Juan
    Bove, Pierluigi
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [40] Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Kunpeng
    Yu, Xiaodong
    Yang, Xuesong
    Huang, Jing
    Deng, Xianzhong
    Su, Zhongsan
    Wang, Chunli
    Wu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (01) : 83 - 98