Novel block element with axial-only deformation for limit analysis of masonry arch bridges

被引:2
|
作者
Hua, Yiwei [1 ]
Milani, Gabriele [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture Built Environm & Construct Engn, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Limit analysis; Masonry arch bridges; Arch-fill interaction; Collapse performance; Kinematic theorem;
D O I
10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107361
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a novel limit analysis block element to model the ring behavior in masonry arch bridges, with consideration of axial deformation induced by both bending and axial compressing motions. The governing formulation is established based on the kinematic theorem. After constructing the velocity field of the block element, the new compatibility condition is put forward, followed by a discussion of possible linearization for the element constitutive model. A new heterogeneous limit analysis formulation that accounts for the deformability of the elements is given at the end. For benchmarking purposes, the collapse of an 80-block arch is first investigated to understand the influence of using different constitutive linearizations. Then, the proposed element is applied to analyze the collapse of a practical bridge involving arch-fill interactions. The results indicate a great necessity of considering the deformability of the ring when analyzing the collapse of masonry arch bridges. Compared with previous experimental results of Prestwood Bridge, employing the rigid modeling for the ring will lead to a significantly overestimated load prediction (about 46.3%) while the proposed deformable brick element with quadrilateral-linearized constitutive can produce a very accurate prediction (bias within 1%). Adoption of the hexagon linearization will give rise to a comparatively inflexible block behavior and the corresponding ring performs analogous to the rigid case. Finally, the model proposed gets over the main shortcoming exhibited by a beam discretization of the ring, namely the potential over-flexibility of the bridge arch, induced by the simplification of the actual geometry.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Kinematic approach for scour analysis of masonry arch bridges
    George, Jofin
    Menon, Arun
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2022, 141
  • [22] LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF MASONRY ARCH RAILWAY BRIDGES AT THE SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE
    VOKAL, Marek
    DRAHORAD, M. I. C. H. A. L.
    ACTA POLYTECHNICA, 2022, 62 (02) : 322 - 336
  • [23] Application of limit analysis to stone arch bridges
    Clemente, P.
    Buffarini, G.
    Rinaldis, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCH BRIDGES (ARCH '10), 2010, : 465 - 472
  • [24] LIMIT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH BRIDGES
    Ronca, Paola
    Cohn, M.Z.
    1979, 105 (02): : 313 - 326
  • [25] Discrete element analysis of a stone masonry arch
    Toth, Axel Roland
    Orban, Zoltan
    Bagi, Katalin
    MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 469 - 480
  • [26] Residual Capacity Evaluation of Masonry Arch Bridges by Extended Finite Element Method
    Yazdani, Mahdi
    Habibi, Hossein
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 33 (01) : 183 - 194
  • [27] Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges
    Sevim, Baris
    Bayraktar, Alemdar
    Altunisik, Ahmet Can
    Atamturktur, Sezer
    Birinci, Fatma
    FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, 2011, 47 (07) : 621 - 634
  • [28] Numerical Analysis of Masonry Arch Bridges Subject to Scour Effect
    Di Marco, Federico
    Tetougueni, Cyrille Denis
    Zampieri, Paolo
    Pellegrino, Carlo
    Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2022, 200 LNCE : 1335 - 1342
  • [29] Mesoscale analysis of multi-span masonry arch bridges
    Tubaldi, E.
    Minga, E.
    Macorini, L.
    Izzuddin, B. A.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 225
  • [30] Analysis and assessment of twin-span masonry arch bridges
    Hughes, TG
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 1995, 110 (04) : 373 - 382