Exploring a process-relational approach to qualitative research methods for sustainability science

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia, Maria Mancilla [1 ,2 ]
Abunge, Caroline [3 ]
Bandeira, Salomao Olinda [4 ]
Cheupe, Christopher [3 ]
Combane, Dadivo Jose [5 ]
Daw, Tim [1 ]
O'Neill, Elizabeth Maria Drury [1 ]
Hertz, Tilman [1 ]
Mubai, Marlino [6 ,7 ]
Muthiga, Nyawira [3 ]
Gonzalez, Tais Sonetti [2 ]
Shauri, Halimu [8 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Socioenvironm Dynam Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Wildlife Conservat Soc Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya
[4] Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Maputo, Mozambique
[5] Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Commun & Arts Sch, Drama Dept, Maputo, Mozambique
[6] Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Hist Dept, Maputo, Mozambique
[7] Univ Pretoria, Dept Heritage & Cultural Studies, Hatfield, South Africa
[8] Pwani Univ, Dept Social Sci, Kilifi, Kenya
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
action research; apparatus; coding; interviews; process-relational perspectives; PHILOSOPHY;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10667
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
As sustainability scientists increasingly put forward the relevance of process-relational approaches to make sense of social-ecological phenomena, an inquiry on which methods would fit a process-relational approach is necessary. This paper discusses how a process-relational approach can be applied to traditional qualitative research methods, namely interviews and coding and the tensions associated with it. Process-relational perspectives share commonalities with interpretative approaches but also present specific characteristics, such as the importance of material aspects and the understanding of the phenomenon as a moment in which different elements become defined respective to each other. The paper uses data and researchers' experiences from an action research project seeking to support collective action among coastal communities affected by environmental changes in Kenya and Mozambique.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. & Agrave; medida que os cientistas da sustentabilidade defendem cada vez mais a relev & acirc;ncia das abordagens processo-relacionais para compreender fen & ocirc;menos socioecol & oacute;gicos, torna-se necess & aacute;rio investigar quais m & eacute;todos seriam adequados para uma abordagem processual-relacional. Este artigo discute como uma abordagem relacional-processual pode ser aplicada aos m & eacute;todos tradicionais de pesquisa qualitativa, nomeadamente entrevistas e codifica & ccedil;& atilde;o, e as tens & otilde;es associadas a eles. As perspectivas de processo-relacionais partilham similaridades com abordagens interpretativas, mas tamb & eacute;m apresentam caracter & iacute;sticas espec & iacute;ficas, como a import & acirc;ncia dos aspectos materiais e a compreens & atilde;o do fen & ocirc;meno como um momento no qual diferentes elementos se definem em rela & ccedil;& atilde;o uns aos outros. O artigo utiliza dados e experi & ecirc;ncias de pesquisadores de um projeto de investiga & ccedil;& atilde;o-a & ccedil;& atilde;o que busca apoiar a a & ccedil;& atilde;o coletiva entre comunidades costeiras afetadas por mudan & ccedil;as ambientais no Qu & ecirc;nia e em Mo & ccedil;ambique. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:1512 / 1523
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research
    Fritz, Livia
    Binder, Claudia R.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [22] Qualitative research in Implementation Science (QUALRIS): Strong methods for strong science
    Hamilton, Alison
    Cohen, Deborah
    Crabtree, Benjamin
    Damschroder, Laura
    Leeman, Jennifer
    Padgett, Deborah
    Palinkas, Lawrence
    Rabin, Borsika
    Reisinger, Heather Schacht
    Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [23] Qualitative research in Implementation Science (QUALRIS): Strong methods for strong science
    Hamilton, Alison
    Cohen, Deborah
    Crabtree, Benjamin
    Damschroder, Laura
    Leeman, Jennifer
    Padgett, Deborah
    Palinkas, Lawrence
    Rabin, Borsika
    Reisinger, Heather Schacht
    Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [24] THE USE OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS IN QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE: A REVIEW
    Jervis, M. G.
    Drake, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2014, 29 (04) : 234 - 247
  • [25] EXPLORING THE BENEFITS OF A SUBJECTIVE APPROACH IN QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH
    SCHUTZ, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 20 (03) : 412 - 417
  • [26] Reflexivity: A Qualitative Approach to Quantitative Research Methods
    Cuffy, Myntha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 730 - 731
  • [27] Medical research and qualitative methods: A rational approach
    Colliver, JA
    Verhulst, SJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (03) : 211 - 211
  • [28] New capacities and enhanced research agenda for science: Exploring relational cooperation with industry
    Verre, Vladimiro
    Milesi, Dario
    Petelski, Natalia
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (04) : 434 - 445
  • [29] Journeying the quagmire: Exploring the discourses that shape the qualitative research process
    O'Connor, D
    [J]. AFFILIA-FEMINIST INQUIRY IN SOCIAL WORK, 2001, 16 (02): : 138 - 158
  • [30] A Queer Critical Approach to Exploring Trans* Male Identity Construction Using Mixed Qualitative Methods Research
    Grace, Andre
    Levesque, Michel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):