Revolutionizing T3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer staging with an innovative pathologic N classification system

被引:2
|
作者
Yin, Kailai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jin, Xuanhong [5 ]
Pan, Yang [1 ]
Zi, Mengli [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Yingsong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Yubo [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Pang, Chuhong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Kang [2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Chen, Jinxia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wei, Yizhou [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Dujiang [1 ]
Cheng, Xiangdong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yuan, Li [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Postgrad Training Base Alliance, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Hangzhou Inst Med HIM, Dept Gastr Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Zhejiang Prov Res Ctr Upper Gastrointestinal Tract, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Zhejiang Key Lab Prevent Diag & Therapy Upper Gast, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Shaw Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Med Oncol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Examined lymph nodes; Lymph node ratio; New nodal classification; Stomach neoplasms; EXAMINED LYMPH-NODES; INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; 8TH EDITION; RATIO; SURVIVAL; NUMBER; METASTASIS; RESECTION; LYMPHADENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.031
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The current pathologic N (pN) classification exhibits limitations in the prognostic stratification of patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a new lymph nodal staging method based on the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR). Methods: Data from 7883 patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 GC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and Zhejiang Cancer Provincial Hospital. Optimal cutoff values for ELNs and LNR were determined using X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier methods, Log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were employed in this study. Patients were categorized into 3 new pN stages: new pN0 (pN0 with ELNs of >16), new pN1 (pN0 with ELNs of <= 16 or pN1-2 with LNR of <= 0.15), and new pN2 (pN1-2 with LNR of >0.15). The prognostic predictive power of both current and new pN staging was evaluated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion, concordance index (C-index), and receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: The new pN classification exhibited excellent performance in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. After adjusting for confounding factors, the new pN staging emerged as an independent prognostic indicator in patients with GC. In the SEER cohort, the new pN staging demonstrated enhanced prognostic prediction accuracy over the American Joint Committee on Cancer pN staging (AIC: 75578.85 vs 75755.06; C-index: 0.642 vs 0.630; P < .001). Similar findings were validated in the Chinese cohort. Conclusion: This study developed and validated an improved pN classification for patients with pT3-4N0-2M0 GC. Surgeons should consider ELNs and LNR when assessing postoperative prognosis in patients with GC.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1293
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of unselected patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer
    Kennecke, Hagen
    Lim, Howard
    Woods, Ryan
    McGahan, Colleen E.
    Hay, John
    Raval, Manoj J.
    Johal, Balvinder
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (02) : 214 - 219
  • [42] Is there any role of adjuvant chemotherapy for T3N0M0 or T1N2M0 gastric cancer, stage II in 7th TNM but stage I in 6th TNM system?
    Lee, H. J.
    Lee, K. G.
    Suh, Y. S.
    Kong, S. H.
    Oh, D. Y.
    Im, S. A.
    Bang, Y. J.
    Yang, H. K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 : S424 - S424
  • [43] Differences in risk factors for mortality between T2N1M0 and T3N0M0 lobular breast cancer patients: a comparative study
    Xia, Longjie
    Qin, Chunxin
    Chen, Wei
    Chen, Kang
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [44] Measurement of B(τ → Knπ0ν), n=0, 1, 2, 3 and B(τ → πnπ0ν), n=3, 4 by BABAR
    Lusiani, Alberto
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, EPS-HEP2019, 2020,
  • [45] Reconsidering N component of cancer staging for T1-2N0-2M0 small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study based on multicenter cohort
    Lei-Lei Wu
    Li-Hong Qiu
    Xiaolu Chen
    Wan-Jun Yu
    Chong-Wu Li
    Jia-Yi Qian
    Shen-Hua Liang
    Peng Lin
    Hao Long
    Lan-Jun Zhang
    Zhi-Xin Li
    Kun Li
    Feng Jiang
    Guo-Wei Ma
    Dong Xie
    Respiratory Research, 24
  • [46] A comparison of the outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for clinical T2-T4aN0-N2M0 bladder cancer
    Wosnitzer, Matthew S.
    Hruby, Gregory W.
    Murphy, Alana M.
    Barlow, Lamont J.
    Cordon-Cardo, Carlos
    Mansukhani, Mahesh
    Petrylak, Daniel P.
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    McKiernan, James M.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (02) : 358 - 364
  • [47] Comparison of T2N0M0 and T3aN0M0 in Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma
    He, Xiaobo
    Mao, Xiaopeng
    Li, Jibin
    Guo, Shengjie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [48] Reconsidering N component of cancer staging for T1-2N0-2M0 small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study based on multicenter cohort
    Wu, Lei-Lei
    Qiu, Li-Hong
    Chen, Xiaolu
    Yu, Wan-Jun
    Li, Chong-Wu
    Qian, Jia-Yi
    Liang, Shen-Hua
    Lin, Peng
    Long, Hao
    Zhang, Lan-Jun
    Li, Zhi-Xin
    Li, Kun
    Jiang, Feng
    Ma, Guo-Wei
    Xie, Dong
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [49] STAGE-IIIA (T3N0M0) BREAST-CANCER
    OSTROVTSEV, LD
    DEMIDOV, VP
    KASYANOVA, IV
    SLIVINSKAYA, ZP
    KHIRURGIYA, 1989, (05): : 10 - 16
  • [50] Is There Any Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for T3N0M0 or T1N2M0 Gastric Cancer Patients in Stage II in the 7th TNM but Stage I in the 6th TNM System?
    Kyung-Goo Lee
    Hyuk-Joon Lee
    Seung-Young Oh
    Jun-Young Yang
    Hye-Seong Ahn
    Yun-Suhk Suh
    Seong-Ho Kong
    Tae-Yong Kim
    Do-Youn Oh
    Seock-Ah Im
    Kuhn Uk Lee
    Woo Ho Kim
    Yung-Jue Bang
    Han-Kwang Yang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 1234 - 1243