Diagnostic utility of anti-cN1A autoantibody testing in sporadic inclusion body myositis

Background/Aims Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is the most common acquired myopathy in patients aged over 50 years. Diagnostic criteria encompass clinical, biochemical, and myopathological features. Certain myopathological features possess high specificity but low sensitivity; reliance on such findings may lead to delayed or misdiagnoses. The discovery of autoantibodies against cytosolic 5'-Nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) in sIBM patients suggests an autoimmune component in pathogenesis, but the inclusion of this autoantibody in diagnostic criteria remains uncertain. Additionally, optimal testing methodology has not been established, with varying techniques (e.g., ELISA/line-blot) in use. We assessed antibody profiles in an sIBM cohort and reviewed diagnoses in anti-cN1A positive patients. Methods This study was based at the Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust which hosts a tertiary neuromuscular referral service for the North-West of England. Data sources included myositis clinic and immunology results databases. All patients tested using a validated myositis line-blot immunoassay (EUROLINE 16 Antigen et cN1A [EUROIMMUN]) November 2021-April 2023 were included. Diagnoses of all tested patients were identified through case-note review. Sensitivity and specificity metrics were calculated based on diagnosis and anti-cN1A antibody status. Results The total number of patients tested for anti-cN1A was 495. Of these, 10 patients had a diagnosis of sIBM. The true-positive and false-negative rates were both 50% (n = 5 each). Of the 485 patients who did not have sIBM, true-negativity was 97.52% (n = 473) and false-positivity 2.47% (n = 12). Overall, anti-cN1A had a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 97.52%, positive predictive value of 29.41% and negative predictive value of 98.95% for sIBM (Table 1). Patients with a false-positive anti-cN1A antibody had diagnoses of: primary Raynaud's (n = 5); undifferentiated CTD (n = 3); systemic sclerosis (n = 2); non-sIBM myositis (n = 2). Conclusion Anti-cN1A detected using the EUROLINE 16 Antigen assay has high specificity but lacks sensitivity for sIBM, consistent with previous literature. These findings suggest that this assay performs similarly to other cN1A detection methodologies and has utility in confirming the diagnosis of sIBM where there is clinical suspicion. Further real-world analysis of antibody data in larger cohorts is required to clarify the role of serological testing in sIBM diagnostic criteria, to improve diagnostic delays and misclassifications. Disclosure M. Al-Attar: None. T. Khoo: None. J.B. Lilleker: None. H. Chinoy: None.