Are artificial intelligence chatbots a reliable source of information about contact lenses?

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia-Porta, Nery [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Vaughan, Megan [3 ]
Rendo-Gonzalez, Sofia [1 ]
Gomez-Varela, Ana I. [1 ,2 ]
O'Donnell, Autumn [4 ]
de-Moura, Joaquim [5 ]
Novo-Bujan, Jorge [5 ]
Ortega-Hortas, Marcos [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Opt & Optometry Fac, Appl Phys Dept, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Inst Mat iMATUS, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
[5] Univ A Coruna, INIBIC, Varpa Grp, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Opt & Optometry, Santiago De Compostela 15782, A Coruna, Spain
来源
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE | 2024年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
Contact lenses; Artificial intelligence chatbots; Eye care professionals; Optometrists; Ophthalmologists; Contact lens opticians; PURCHASING LENSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2024.102130
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots are able to explain complex concepts using plain language. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of three AI chatbots answering common questions related to contact lens (CL) wear. Methods: Three open access AI chatbots were compared: Perplexity, Open Assistant and ChatGPT 3.5. Ten general CL questions were asked to all AI chatbots on the same day in two different countries, with the questions asked in Spanish from Spain and in English from the U.K. Two independent optometrists with experience working in each country assessed the accuracy of the answers provided. Also, the AI chatbots' responses were assessed if their outputs showed any bias towards (or against) any eye care professional (ECP). Results: The answers obtained by the same AI chatbots were different in Spain and the U.K. Also, statistically significant differences were found between the AI chatbots for accuracy. In the U.K., ChatGPT 3.5 was the most and Open Assistant least accurate (p < 0.01). In Spain, Perplexity and ChatGPT were statistically more accurate than Open Assistant (p < 0.01). All the AI chatbots presented bias, except ChatGPT 3.5 in Spain. Conclusions: AI chatbots do not always consider local CL legislation, and their accuracy seems to be dependent on the language used to interact with them. Hence, at this time, although some AI chatbots might be a good source of information for general CL related questions, they cannot replace an ECP.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
    King, Michael R.
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING, 2023, 16 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [32] Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, Plagiarism and Basic Honesty: Comment
    Kleebayoon, Amnuay
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING, 2023, 16 (02) : 173 - 174
  • [33] Addressing Chatbots as Artificial Intelligence Aids in Pediatric Pathology
    Schukow, Casey
    Nguyen, Van-Hung
    PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 27 (03) : 278 - 279
  • [34] Banking Chatbots: How Artificial Intelligence Helps the Banks
    Cimpeanu, Ionut-Alexandru
    Dragomir, Denis-Alexandru
    Zota, Razvan Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 17 (01): : 1716 - 1727
  • [35] A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts
    Lin, Yupeng
    Yu, Zhonggen
    INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2024, 21 (02) : 189 - 213
  • [36] A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
    Michael R. King
    Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 2023, 16 : 1 - 2
  • [37] Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Interpretation of Pathology Reports
    Steimetz, Eric
    Minkowitz, Jeremy
    Gabutan, Elmer C.
    Ngichabe, Joan
    Attia, Hagar
    Hershkop, Mordechai
    Ozay, Fatih
    Hanna, Matthew G.
    Gupta, Raavi
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2412767
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence Virtual Assistants (Chatbots) are Innovative Investigators
    Khan, Shakir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2020, 20 (02): : 93 - 98
  • [39] Student satisfaction with artificial intelligence chatbots in Ethiopian academia
    Subaveerapandiyan, A.
    Radhakrishnan, S.
    Tiwary, Neelam
    Guangul, Sisay Mulate
    IFLA JOURNAL-INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONS, 2024,
  • [40] Can Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Convincingly Mimic Empathy?
    Fink, Jennifer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2023, 123 (08) : 13 - 13