Are artificial intelligence chatbots a reliable source of information about contact lenses?

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia-Porta, Nery [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Vaughan, Megan [3 ]
Rendo-Gonzalez, Sofia [1 ]
Gomez-Varela, Ana I. [1 ,2 ]
O'Donnell, Autumn [4 ]
de-Moura, Joaquim [5 ]
Novo-Bujan, Jorge [5 ]
Ortega-Hortas, Marcos [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Opt & Optometry Fac, Appl Phys Dept, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Inst Mat iMATUS, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[3] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Cork, Ireland
[5] Univ A Coruna, INIBIC, Varpa Grp, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Opt & Optometry, Santiago De Compostela 15782, A Coruna, Spain
来源
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE | 2024年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
Contact lenses; Artificial intelligence chatbots; Eye care professionals; Optometrists; Ophthalmologists; Contact lens opticians; PURCHASING LENSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2024.102130
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots are able to explain complex concepts using plain language. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of three AI chatbots answering common questions related to contact lens (CL) wear. Methods: Three open access AI chatbots were compared: Perplexity, Open Assistant and ChatGPT 3.5. Ten general CL questions were asked to all AI chatbots on the same day in two different countries, with the questions asked in Spanish from Spain and in English from the U.K. Two independent optometrists with experience working in each country assessed the accuracy of the answers provided. Also, the AI chatbots' responses were assessed if their outputs showed any bias towards (or against) any eye care professional (ECP). Results: The answers obtained by the same AI chatbots were different in Spain and the U.K. Also, statistically significant differences were found between the AI chatbots for accuracy. In the U.K., ChatGPT 3.5 was the most and Open Assistant least accurate (p < 0.01). In Spain, Perplexity and ChatGPT were statistically more accurate than Open Assistant (p < 0.01). All the AI chatbots presented bias, except ChatGPT 3.5 in Spain. Conclusions: AI chatbots do not always consider local CL legislation, and their accuracy seems to be dependent on the language used to interact with them. Hence, at this time, although some AI chatbots might be a good source of information for general CL related questions, they cannot replace an ECP.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large language models: Are artificial intelligence-based chatbots a reliable source of patient information for spinal surgery?
    Stroop, Anna
    Stroop, Tabea
    Alsofy, Samer Zawy
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Moellmann, Frank
    Greiner, Christoph
    Stroop, Ralf
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 33 (11) : 4135 - 4143
  • [2] Large language models: Are artificial intelligence-based chatbots a reliable source of patient information for spinal surgery?
    Daungsupawong, Hinpetch
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [3] Quality of Information About Kidney Stones from Artificial Intelligence Chatbots
    Musheyev, David
    Pan, Alexander
    Kabarriti, Abdo E.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Borin, James F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] Artificial intelligence chatbots: Are they a reliable source for patients and families in pediatric neuro-oncology?
    Castellano-Damaso, Serafin
    Vazquez-Gomez, Felisa
    Perez-Somarriba, Marta
    Sanchez-Salazar, Mauricio
    Lassaletta, Alvaro
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2024, 71 (09)
  • [5] Use of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Cancer Treatment Information
    Chen, Shan
    Kann, Benjamin H.
    Foote, Michael B.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    Savova, Guergana K.
    Mak, Raymond H.
    Bitterman, Danielle S.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2023, 9 (10) : 1459 - 1462
  • [6] Chatbots & artificial intelligence to scale genetic information delivery
    Nazareth, Shivani
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    Siglen, Elen
    Wicklund, Catherine A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (01) : 7 - 10
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots in Psychiatry
    Kay T. Pham
    Amir Nabizadeh
    Salih Selek
    [J]. Psychiatric Quarterly, 2022, 93 : 249 - 253
  • [8] Artificial intelligence marketing: Chatbots
    Arsenijevic, Uros
    Jovic, Marija
    [J]. 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS (IC-AIAI 2019), 2019, : 19 - 22
  • [9] Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots in Psychiatry
    Pham, Kay T.
    Nabizadeh, Amir
    Selek, Salih
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2022, 93 (01) : 249 - 253
  • [10] On Chatbots and Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Oermann, Eric Karl
    Kondziolka, Douglas
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (04) : 665 - 666