Making the case for democracy: A field-experiment on democratic persuasion

被引:1
|
作者
Wuttke, Alexander [1 ]
Foos, Florian [2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
关键词
democratic backsliding; field-experiment; randomized control trial; support for democracy; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/1475-6765.12705
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Ordinary citizens can serve as a critical defence against democratic backsliding. But beneath the surface, citizens' commitment to democracy is sometimes fragile, with crises exacerbating existing anxieties. We introduce 'democratic persuasion' as an actionable intervention to foster the resilience of citizens' commitment to liberal democracy. 'Democratic persuasion' seizes the opportunity of communicating with wavering democrats. 'Democratic persuasion' entails actively making the case for democracy and discussing democracy's inherent trade-offs while engaging existing doubts and misperceptions. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, which stirred frustrations with democracy and highlighted democratic trade-offs, we invited citizens via Facebook to participate in one of sixteen Zoom town halls to engage in discussions on pandemic politics with members of German state and federal parliaments. Each representative hosted two town halls, with random assignment to a condition of 'democratic persuasion' in one of the two town hall meetings. The field experiment yielded mixed results, demonstrating significant effects on some indicators of democratic commitment but not on others. This study contributes to the nascent body of research aimed at reinforcing the societal pillars of liberal democracies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EPISTEMIC FEATURE OF DEMOCRACY: THE ROLE OF EXPERT IN DEMOCRATIC DECISION MAKING
    Jankovic, Ivana
    PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY-FILOZOFIJA I DRUSTVO, 2020, 31 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [22] Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data
    Bocqueho, Geraldine
    Jacquet, Florence
    Reynaud, Arnaud
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) : 135 - 172
  • [23] Patterns of democracy and democratic satisfaction: Results from a comparative conjoint experiment
    Papp, Zsofia
    Navarro, Julien
    Russo, Federico
    Nagy, Laura Emoke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (04) : 1445 - 1470
  • [24] Teaching political information and democratic values in a new democracy - An Argentine experiment
    Morduchowicz, R
    Catterberg, E
    Niemi, RG
    Bell, F
    COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 1996, 28 (04) : 465 - &
  • [25] Modeling denitrification nitrogen losses in China's rice fields based on multiscale field-experiment constraints
    Zhang, Huayan
    Adalibieke, Wulahati
    Ba, Wenxin
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    Yu, Longfei
    Cai, Andong
    Fu, Jin
    Yu, Haoming
    Zhang, Wantong
    Huang, Weichen
    Jian, Yiwei
    Jiang, Wenjun
    Zhao, Zheng
    Luo, Jiafa
    Deng, Jia
    Zhou, Feng
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (02)
  • [26] PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY MAKING
    CONWAY, MM
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1977, 5 (04) : 459 - 464
  • [27] Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management
    Carolyn M. Hendriks
    Policy Sciences, 2009, 42 : 341 - 368
  • [28] Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management
    Hendriks, Carolyn M.
    POLICY SCIENCES, 2009, 42 (04) : 341 - 368
  • [29] Direct Democracy against Democratic Deficit: the Uruguayan Case
    Lissidini, Alicia
    RECERCA-REVISTA DE PENSAMENT & ANALISI, 2023, 28 (01):
  • [30] Guardians of Democracy or Passive Bystanders? A Conjoint Experiment on Elite Transgressions of Democratic Norms
    Saikkonen, Inga A-L
    Christensen, Henrik Serup
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 76 (01) : 127 - 142