Optimal resources allocation to support the consensus reaching in group decision making

被引:8
|
作者
Fan, Sha [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Haiming [1 ,2 ]
Li, Cong-Cong [3 ]
Chiclana, Francisco [4 ,5 ]
Pedrycz, Witold [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Dong, Yucheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Xiangjiang Lab, Changsha 410205, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[4] De Montfort Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence, Leicester, England
[5] De Montfort Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Leicester, England
[6] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
[7] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Taipa 999078, Macao, Peoples R China
[8] Istinye Univ, Res Ctr Performance & Prod Anal, Istanbul, Turkiye
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision and negotiation; Consensus; Resources allocation; Utility function; Decision support; MINIMUM-COST; UTILITY FUNCTION; MAXIMUM-RETURN; MODELS; ADJUSTMENT; OPERATORS; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102451
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In group decision making (GDM), the minimum cost consensus model (MCCM) to assist a group to reach a consensus with the minimum cost has gained widespread attention. However, determining the unit costs for adjusting decision makers' opinions in the MCCM is a challenging problem that limits its practical applications. Meanwhile, the MCCM is not modeled as a resources allocation problem in an explicit manner, and the opinions in the MCCM do not represent utilities/satisfactions, leading to the unclear implications of opinions' adjustments. To overcome these limitations of the MCCM, this paper proposes the optimal resources allocation consensus model (ORACM) to assist the moderator to allocate resources without determining unit costs to support consensus reaching, through the introduction of the resources allocation problem and utility functions in its modeling. Furthermore, we present a theoretical analysis framework to reveal the properties of the ORACM and the connection between the ORACM and the MCCM, justifying the theoretical advantages of the ORACM. Moreover, the ORACM is applied to the transboundary river pollution control negotiations of Sichuan's Tuojiang River, and the effectiveness and feasibility of the ORACM are further validated with detailed simulation and comparison analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making
    Wibowo, Santoso
    Deng, Hepu
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 66 (04) : 625 - 633
  • [22] Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making
    Cheng, Dong
    Cheng, Faxin
    Zhou, Zhili
    Wu, Yong
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 : 30 - 43
  • [23] Consensus Reaching in Group Decision Making With Linear Uncertain Preferences and Asymmetric Costs
    Xu, Xiaoxia
    Gong, Zaiwu
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Kou, Gang
    Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (05): : 2887 - 2899
  • [24] Dual probabilistic linguistic consensus reaching method for group decision-making
    Abhijit Saha
    Tapan Senapati
    Muhammad Akram
    Cengiz Kahraman
    Radko Mesiar
    Leena Arya
    Granular Computing, 2024, 9
  • [25] The interactive consensus reaching process with the minimum and uncertain cost in group decision making
    Li, Yao
    Zhang, Hengjie
    Dong, Yucheng
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 202 - 212
  • [26] Dual probabilistic linguistic consensus reaching method for group decision-making
    Saha, Abhijit
    Senapati, Tapan
    Akram, Muhammad
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Mesiar, Radko
    Arya, Leena
    GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2024, 9 (02)
  • [27] Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making
    Dept. of Computer Science and A.I., ETS de Ing. Informática, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    Int J Approximate Reasoning, 3-4 SPEC. ISS. (309-334):
  • [28] A consensus reaching process with quantum subjective adjustment in linguistic group decision making
    Tan, Xiao
    Zhu, Jianjun
    Zhang, Yuhuai
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 533 (533) : 150 - 168
  • [29] Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges
    Dong, Yucheng
    Zha, Quanbo
    Zhang, Hengjie
    Kou, Gang
    Fujita, Hamido
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 3 - 13
  • [30] Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making
    Herrera, F
    Herrera-Viedma, E
    Verdegay, JL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 1997, 16 (3-4) : 309 - 334