User Experience Evaluation of a Spinal Surgery Robot: Workload, Usability, and Satisfaction Study

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Hyeonkyeong [1 ]
Kim, Seunghee [1 ]
Jang, Wonseuk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med Device Engn & Management, 20 63rd Rd,Unju Ro, Seoul 06229, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Coll Med, Med Device Usabil Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JMIR HUMAN FACTORS | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
robot spine surgery; usability; satisfaction; System Usability Scale; surgical navigation systems; robotics; surgery; neurosurgery;
D O I
10.2196/54425
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Robotic spine surgery has continued to evolve since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2004, with products now including real-time video guidance and navigation during surgery. As the market for robotic surgical devices evolves, it is important to consider usability factors. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the user experience of a surgical-assistive robotic device. The secondary objective was to evaluate workload, usability, the After -Scenario Questionnaire (ASQ), and the System Usability Scale (SUS). In addition, this study compares the workload, usability, and satisfaction survey of the device among different occupational groups using the device. Methods: Doctors (n=15) and nurses (n=15), the intended users of the surgical assistant robot, participated in the usability evaluation. Participants performed essential scenarios for the surgical assistant robot and provided scenario -specific satisfaction (ASQ), workload (NASA Task Load Index), and usability (SUS) scores. Results: Both doctors and nurses had task success rates of 85% or higher for each scenario. ASQ results showed that both doctors and nurses were least satisfied with ease of completing the task of registration (group 1: mean 4.73, SD 1.57 and group 2: mean 4.47, SD 1.8), amount of time it took (group 1: mean 4.47, SD 1.63 and group 2: mean 4.40, SD 2.09), and support information satisfaction (group 1: mean 5.13, SD 1.50 and group 2: mean 5.13, SD 1.89). All participants had low workloads, and the overall Task Load Index score had a P value of .77, which is greater than .05. The SUS results showed that the overall usability mean for doctors was 64.17 (SD 16.52) and the mean for nurses was 61.67 (SD 19.18), with a P value of .84, which is greater than .05, indicating no difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions: In this study, doctors and nurses evaluated the interaction of the device in a simulated environment, the operating room. By evaluating the use experience and usability of the device with real intended users, we can develop a more effective and convenient user interface.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benchmarking the User eXperience and Usability of Online Social Networks: Proposal of an Evaluation Framework
    Regalado, Francisco
    Mealha, Oscar
    Santos, Carlos
    Veloso, Ana Isabel
    HUMAN ASPECTS OF IT FOR THE AGED POPULATION, PT I, ITAP 2024, 2024, 14725 : 417 - 431
  • [42] The usability of ventilators: a comparative evaluation of use safety and user experience—an editorial response
    Edwin Coombs
    Critical Care, 21
  • [43] Evaluation of the Usability and User Experience of the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Mobile Application in Indonesia
    Handasari, Savira Putri
    Wulandari, Respati
    Haikal
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (04) : 324 - 332
  • [44] The Study on Usability and User Experience of Reading Assessment Systems: A Preliminary Research
    Lin, Peiying
    Liao, Guanze
    LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES, LCT 2023, PT I, 2023, 14040 : 305 - 320
  • [45] Security and Usability of Authenticating Process of Online Banking: User Experience Study
    Althobaiti, Maha M.
    Mayhew, Pam
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY (ICCST), 2014,
  • [46] Longitudinal Study of Usability and User Experience in Technical and Professional Communication Research
    Friess, Erin
    Liles, Christina
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION, 2023, 66 (04) : 338 - 355
  • [47] User Behavior Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Retinal Surgery
    He, Changyan
    Ebrahimi, Ali
    Roizenblatt, Marina
    Patel, Niravkumar
    Yang, Yang
    Gehlbach, Peter L.
    Iordachita, Iulian
    2018 27TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN 2018), 2018, : 174 - 179
  • [48] A Study on the Usability Evaluation of Teaching Pendant for Manipulator of Collaborative Robot
    Dong, Jeyoun
    Kwon, Wookyong
    Kang, Dongyeop
    Nam, Seung Woo
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2021 - LATE BREAKING POSTERS, HCII 2021, PT I, 2021, 1498 : 234 - 238
  • [49] Usability, learning, and subjective experience: User evaluation of K-MODDL in an undergraduate class
    Pan, B
    Gay, G
    Saylor, J
    Hembrooke, H
    Henderson, D
    JCDL 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES: GLOBAL REACH AND DIVERSE IMPACT, 2004, : 188 - 189
  • [50] Evaluation of User Interface, User Experience, and Usability in Software Through Electroencephalography (EEG) Signal Detection: A Mapping Review
    Syahidi, Aulia Akhrian
    Kiyokawa, Kiyoshi
    IWAIIP 2023 - Conference Proceeding: International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing, 2023, : 133 - 138