Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Mallick, Saad [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ,2 ]
Balian, Jeffrey [1 ]
Charland, Nicole [1 ]
Valenzuela, Alberto R. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs CORELAB, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 06期
关键词
MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER-SURGERY; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; COSTS; REGIONALIZATION; COMPLICATIONS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0303586
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. Methods All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Results Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. Conclusion In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Volume and Outcomes in the United States
    Kim, Luke K.
    Minutello, Robert M.
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Swaminathan, Rajesh V.
    Bergman, Geoffrey
    Singh, Harsimran
    Le, Ryan K. Kap
    Wong, S. Chiu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 116 (12): : 1910 - 1915
  • [32] Outcomes of Esophagectomy at Academic Centers: An Association between Volume and Outcome
    Reavis, Kevin M.
    Smith, Brian R.
    Hinojosa, Marcelo W.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2008, 74 (10) : 939 - 943
  • [33] Obstetric Outcomes by Hospital Volume of Operative Vaginal Delivery
    Willy, Annika S.
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2025, 8 (01)
  • [34] Outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries by hospital volume status
    Willy, Annika
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S361 - S361
  • [35] Teaching Hospital Status and Operative Mortality in the United States
    Livingston, Edward H.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (10) : 1025 - 1025
  • [36] Mortality Among Neutropenic Cancer Patients Within the United States: The Association With Hospital Volume
    Urban, Damien
    Urban, Gavin E.
    Margalit, Ofer
    Amit, Uri
    Jacobson, Galia
    Symon, Zvi
    Golan, Talia
    Boursi, Ben
    Lawrence, Yaacov Richard
    JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (04) : E582 - E592
  • [37] Volume thresholds and hospital characteristics in the United States
    Elixhauser, A
    Steiner, C
    Fraser, I
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [38] Hospital volume-related differences in aorto-bifemoral bypass operative mortality in the United States
    Dimick, JB
    Cowan, JA
    Henke, PK
    Wainess, RM
    Posner, S
    Stanley, JC
    Upchurch, GR
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (05) : 970 - 974
  • [39] Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer - Discussion
    Wood, DE
    Swisher
    Starnes, VA
    Jaklitsch, MT
    Benfield, JR
    Jablons, D
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 119 (06): : 1132 - 1134
  • [40] The Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population: Health policy implications
    Morris, AH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (11): : 1754 - 1755