Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Mallick, Saad [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ,2 ]
Balian, Jeffrey [1 ]
Charland, Nicole [1 ]
Valenzuela, Alberto R. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs CORELAB, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 06期
关键词
MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY; CANCER-SURGERY; MULTICENTER; MORTALITY; COSTS; REGIONALIZATION; COMPLICATIONS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0303586
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. Methods All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Results Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. Conclusion In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes of esophagectomy hospitalizations in the United States
    Park, Mina G.
    Haro, Greg
    Mabeza, Russyan Mark
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Verma, Arjun
    Lee, Cory
    Williamson, Catherine
    Benharash, Peyman
    SURGERY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 : 80 - 85
  • [2] Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Elective Pneumonectomy in the United States
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Dobaria, Vishal
    Aguayo, Esteban
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Sanaiha, Yas
    Revels, Sha'Shonda L.
    Benharash, Peyman
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (06): : 1874 - 1881
  • [3] Hospital Operative Volume and Esophagectomy Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs System
    Holleran, Timothy J.
    Napolitano, Michael A.
    Sparks, Andrew D.
    Antevil, Jared L.
    Brody, Fredrick J.
    Trachiotis, Gregory D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 275 : 291 - 299
  • [4] Acute clinical and financial outcomes of esophagectomy at safety-net hospitals in the United States
    Sakowitz, Sara
    Mabeza, Russyan Mark
    Bakhtiyar, Syed Shahyan
    Verma, Arjun
    Ebrahimian, Shayan
    Vadlakonda, Amulya
    Revels, Sha'shonda
    Benharash, Peyman
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (05):
  • [5] Implications of Hospital Volume on Costs Following Esophagectomy in the United States
    Kennedy, Gregory T.
    Ukert, Benjamin D.
    Predina, Jarrod D.
    Newton, Andrew D.
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Polsky, Daniel
    Singhal, Sunil
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (11) : 1845 - 1851
  • [6] Implications of Hospital Volume on Costs Following Esophagectomy in the United States
    Gregory T. Kennedy
    Benjamin D. Ukert
    Jarrod D. Predina
    Andrew D. Newton
    John C. Kucharczuk
    Daniel Polsky
    Sunil Singhal
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2018, 22 : 1845 - 1851
  • [7] Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy
    Kuo, EY
    Chang, YC
    Wright, CD
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1118 - 1124
  • [8] Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy - Discussion
    Reed, CC
    Wright
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1124 - 1124
  • [9] ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE UNITED STATES: A DECADE OF OUTCOMES
    Kroner, Paul T.
    Francis, Dawn L.
    Thomas, Mathew
    DeVault, Kenneth R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1302 - S1302
  • [10] Improving outcomes after esophagectomy: the impact of operative volume
    Casson, AG
    Van Lanschot, JJB
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 92 (03) : 262 - 266