Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an immunochromatographic test for Chlamydia trachomatis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Shu-Lian [2 ]
Lin, Hui-Ling [2 ]
Mi, Hong-Fei [3 ]
Meng, Qing-Qi [4 ]
Yan, Ya [4 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Luo [1 ,6 ]
Gu, Wei-Ming [5 ,7 ]
Xiao, Yao [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Hosp Infect Management, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Huli Dist Matern & Child Care Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen Branch, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Ctr Clin Lab, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Skin Dis Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] 201-209 Hubinnan Rd, Xiamen 361004, Peoples R China
[7] 238 Wuyi Rd, Shanghai 200050, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chlamydia trachomatis; Immunochromatographic test; Diagnostic performance; Clinical application; Quality control; SYPHILIS; POINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00412
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different brands of immunochromatographic test (ICT) reagents for Chlamydia trachomatis using homogenized samples to provide a reference for reagent quality control. Methods: Eight commercially available ICT reagents were evaluated, of which three used the latex method and five used the colloidal gold method. Analytical performance evaluation using a pure culture broth of C. trachomatis, as well as clinical application validation using cervical epithelial cell samples acquired from the research subjects, were conducted. The concentration of C. trachomatis was quantified using a nucleic acid amplification test. Results: The limit of detection (LOD) of different ICT reagents in the analytical performance evaluation varied from 9.5 x 103 to 1 x 105 IFU/mL, and only one reagent met the LOD specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Likewise, only one reagent in the clinical application validation achieved the analytical LOD, four reagents were 2.1-4.2-fold of the analytical LODs, and three reagents failed to detect positive results in clinical samples. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of different methods and different brands of ICT reagents in clinical practice was different from the manufacturer's instructions and the results of laboratory evaluation. The diagnostic performance of reagents should be evaluated before they are actually used in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF A MICRODOT IMMUNOFLUORESCENT ANTIGEN-DETECTION TEST FOR CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS
    THOMPSON, C
    JONES, R
    SMITH, B
    BROGAN, O
    SMITH, IW
    CARRINGTON, D
    GENITOURINARY MEDICINE, 1994, 70 (04): : 262 - 264
  • [22] Evaluation of a rapid self-administered test for Chlamydia trachomatis:: caveat emptor
    Kegg, S.
    Roberts, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2006, 17 : 39 - 40
  • [23] INDIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TEST ON CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS INCLUSIONS
    SCIEUX, C
    COLIMON, R
    PEROL, Y
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 1982, 12 (08): : 466 - 469
  • [24] An evaluation of the diagnostic performance characteristics of the Yellow Fever IgM immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic test kit from SD Biosensor in Ghana
    Ofosu-Appiah, Lawrence Henry
    Amelor, Dodzi Kofi
    Ayensu, Bright
    Akyereko, Ernest
    Rabiwu, Nafisah Issah
    Opare, David
    Owusu-Okyere, Godfred
    Laryea, Dennis Odai
    Asiedu-Bekoe, Franklin
    Mingle, Julius Abraham Addo
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [25] What is the impact of change in diagnostic test method on surveillance data trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infection?
    Burckhardt, F
    Warner, P
    Young, H
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2006, 82 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [26] CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS PERIHEPATITIS - DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CONTRIBUTION OF LAPAROSCOPY
    VANGOSSUM, M
    BURETTE, A
    JONAS, C
    NYST, JF
    DELTENRE, M
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 1987, 50 (04): : 445 - 449
  • [27] Paper-based molecular diagnostic for Chlamydia trachomatis
    Linnes, Jacqueline C.
    Fan, Andy
    Rodriguez, Natalia M.
    Lemieux, Bertrand
    Kong, Huimin
    Klapperich, Catherine M.
    RSC ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (80): : 42245 - 42251
  • [28] Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis:: Is the diagnostic efficacy good enough?
    Niederhauser, C
    Honegger, C
    Kaempf, L
    GYNAKOLOGISCH-GEBURTSHILFLICHE RUNDSCHAU, 2000, 40 (3-4): : 134 - 139
  • [29] CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS - DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF THE PAPANICOLAOU SMEAR
    DONATH, EM
    SCHRAGE, R
    HOYME, UB
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1985, 45 (06) : 402 - 405
  • [30] Evaluation of the cobas 4800 CT/NG test for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
    Rockett, Rebecca
    Goire, Namraj
    Limnios, Athena
    Turra, Mark
    Higgens, Geoffrey
    Lambert, Stephen B.
    Bletchly, Cheryl
    Nissen, Michael D.
    Sloots, Theo P.
    Whiley, David M.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2010, 86 (06) : 470 - 473