Plants Restoration Drives the Gobi Soil Microbial Diversity for Improving Soil Quality

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Lizhi [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Junyong [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Qifeng [2 ]
Hu, Yongchao [4 ]
Feng, Jinxiao [5 ]
机构
[1] Ludong Univ, Fac Hydraul Engn Environm & Oceanog, Yantai 264025, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Acad Agr & Reclamat Sci, Inst Field Water Conservancy Soil & Fertilizer Res, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Northwest Oasis Water Saving Agr, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China
[4] Dongying Res Inst Oceanog Dev, Dongying 257091, Peoples R China
[5] Qingdao Inst Technol, Qingdao 266300, Peoples R China
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 15期
关键词
Gobi Desert; ecological restoration; drought and salt stress; physicochemical properties; microbial diversity; soil quality improvement;
D O I
10.3390/plants13152159
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Desertification and salt stress are major causes of terrestrial ecosystem loss worldwide, and the Gobi, representing a salt-stressed area in inland China, has a major impact on the ecosystems and biodiversity of its surrounding environment. The restoration of the Gobi Desert is an important way to control its expansion, but there are few studies on the evaluation of restoration. In this study, soils under different restoration scenarios, namely, soils in restored areas (R1, R2), semi-restored areas (SR1, SR2), and unrestored control areas (C1, C2), were used to investigate differences in microbial diversity and physicochemical properties. The results showed that the soil was mainly dominated by particles of 4-63 mu m (26.45-37.94%) and >63 mu m (57.95-72.87%). Across the different restoration levels, the soil pH (7.96-8.43) remained basically unchanged, salinity decreased from 9.23-2.26 to 0.24-0.25, and water content remained constant (10.98-12.27%) except for one restored sample in which it was higher (22.32%). The effective Al, Cu, and Zn in the soil increased, but only slightly. Total organic matter (TOM) decreased from 3.86-5.20% to 1.31-1.47%, and total organic nitrogen (TON) decreased from 0.03-0.06% to 0.01-0.02%, but the difference in total organic carbon (TOC) was not significant. High-throughput testing revealed that the bacterial population of the restored area was dominated by A4b (6.33-9.18%), MND1 (4.94-7.39%), and Vicinamibacteraceae (7.04-7.39%). Regarding archaea, samples from the restored areas were dominated by Marine Group II (76.17-81.49%) and Candidatus Nitrososphaera (6.07-9.75%). PCoA showed that the different restoration levels were the main cause of the differences between the samples. Additionally, salinity was the dominant factor that induced this difference, but it was inhibited by the restoration and targeted enrichment of some of these functional genera. Desert restoration should therefore focus on conserving water rather than adding nutrients. Planting salt- and drought-tolerant vegetation will contribute to the initial restoration of the desert and the restoration of the microbiological content of the soil as it migrates over time, creating a cycle of elements. Restoration stimulates and enhances the microbial diversity of the soil via beneficial microorganisms.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Plantation vegetation restoration enhances the relationship between rhizosphere microbial diversity and soil multifunctionality
    Li, Jiajia
    Yang, Le
    Fan, Miaochun
    Shangguan, Zhouping
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (17) : 3630 - 3640
  • [32] Soil microbial diversity: an ISO standard for soil DNA extraction
    Laurent Philippot
    Cristina Abbate
    Antonio Bispo
    Thierry Chesnot
    Sara Hallin
    Philippe Lemanceau
    Kristina Lindström
    Pascal Pandard
    Esperanza Romero
    Michael Schloter
    Pascal Simonet
    Kornelia Smalla
    Berndt-Michael Wilke
    Imes Petric
    Fabrice Martin-Laurent
    [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10 (7) : 1344 - 1345
  • [33] Microbial diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil
    Smalla, Kornelia
    Heuer, Holger
    [J]. FACHGESPRACH BIOLOGISCHE VIELFALT IN DER AGRARLANDSCHAFT, 2012, 436 : 115 - 122
  • [34] Methods of studying soil microbial diversity
    Kirk, JL
    Beaudette, LA
    Hart, M
    Moutoglis, P
    Khironomos, JN
    Lee, H
    Trevors, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 58 (02) : 169 - 188
  • [35] Microbial indicators for soil quality
    Schloter, Michael
    Nannipieri, Paolo
    Sorensen, Soren J.
    van Elsas, Jan Dirk
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2018, 54 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [36] Improving microbial degradation of oil in soil
    Lehtomaki, M.
    Niemela, S.
    [J]. Ambio, 1975, 4 (03): : 126 - 129
  • [37] Microbial indicators for soil quality
    Michael Schloter
    Paolo Nannipieri
    Søren J. Sørensen
    Jan Dirk van Elsas
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018, 54 : 1 - 10
  • [38] MICROBIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL QUALITY
    KENNEDY, AC
    PAPENDICK, RI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1995, 50 (03): : 243 - 248
  • [39] Soil microbial diversity drives the priming effect along climate gradients: a case study in Madagascar
    Kanto Razanamalala
    Tantely Razafimbelo
    Pierre-Alain Maron
    Lionel Ranjard
    Nicolas Chemidlin
    Mélanie Lelièvre
    Samuel Dequiedt
    Volaniaina H Ramaroson
    Claire Marsden
    Thierry Becquer
    Jean Trap
    Eric Blanchart
    Laetitia Bernard
    [J]. The ISME Journal, 2018, 12 : 451 - 462
  • [40] Soil microbial diversity drives the priming effect along climate gradients: a case study in Madagascar
    Razanamalala, Kanto
    Razafimbelo, Tantely
    Maron, Pierre-Alain
    Ranjard, Lionel
    Chemidlin, Nicolas
    Lelievre, Melanie
    Dequiedt, Samuel
    Ramaroson, Volaniaina H.
    Marsden, Claire
    Becquer, Thierry
    Trap, Jean
    Blanchart, Eric
    Bernard, Laetitia
    [J]. ISME JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02): : 451 - 462