What does the public think about artificial intelligence? An investigation of technological frames in different technological context
被引:4
|
作者:
Wang, Shangrui
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
Tsinghua Univ, Inst AI Int Governance, Beijing 100084, Peoples R ChinaTsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
Wang, Shangrui
[1
,2
]
Liang, Zheng
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
Tsinghua Univ, Inst AI Int Governance, Beijing 100084, Peoples R ChinaTsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
Liang, Zheng
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst AI Int Governance, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
Technological frames;
Public participation;
AI governance;
Text analytics;
ChatGPT;
GOVERNANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.giq.2024.101939
中图分类号:
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业];
G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号:
1205 ;
120501 ;
摘要:
Public participation is crucial for the governance of artificial intelligence (AI). However, the public is typically portrayed as a passive recipient in practice, and little is known about their expectations, assumptions and knowledge about AI. Based on the theoretical lens of technological frames, and using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and content coding on 114,393 relevant comments, the article explores public perceptions of the nature of AI, AI strategy and AI in use, and further compares the discourse before and after the launch of ChatGPT. The findings show that ChatGPT amplifies public enthusiasm and expectations of AI, as well as concerns and fears, and draws attention to national competition. However, public discourses are generally conflicting and preliminary, characterized by abstract and grandiose narratives, posing challenges in reaching consensus and generating practical insights. Therefore, this analysis raises serious concerns over public participation in AI governance, as the public not only faces limited channels for substantive involvement but also struggles to articulate effective discourses in the public sphere.
机构:
Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Univ Canberra, Canberra Law Sch, Canberra, NSW, Australia
Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Hobart, Tas, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Bartels, Lorana
Gelb, Karen
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Melbourne, Dept Criminol, Melbourne, Vic, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Gelb, Karen
Spiranovic, Caroline
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Hobart, Tas, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Spiranovic, Caroline
Warner, Kate
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Hobart, Tas, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Warner, Kate
Roberts, Lynne
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Curtin Univ, Sch Psychol, Perth, WA, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Roberts, Lynne
Davis, Julia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Australia, Sch Law, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaAustralian Natl Univ, Ctr Social Res Methods, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia