共 50 条
Partners in vaccination: A community-based intervention to promote COVID-19 vaccination among low-income homebound and disabled adults
被引:1
|作者:
Kim, Sue E.
[1
,2
]
Turner, Barbara J.
[2
]
Steinberg, Jane
[1
]
Solano, Laura
[2
]
Hoffman, Eric
[3
]
Saluja, Sonali
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Populat & Publ Hlth Sci, Keck Sch Med, 1845 N Soto St, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Keck Med Univ Southern Calif, Gehr Family Ctr Hlth Syst Sci & Innovat, 2250 Alcazar St, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles Gen Med Ctr Internal Med Residency Pro, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD,620, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词:
COVID-19;
Vaccine hesitancy;
Care managers;
Motivational interviewing;
Mixed methods;
CARE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101589
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Care managers (CM) for low-income disabled clients may address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy with specific training. Objective: To assess the Partners in Vaccination (PIV) that trained CMs of a homecare program for disabled adults to promote COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We randomized 78 CMs to PIV intervention (N = 38) or control (N = 40). PIV featured motivational interviewing (MI) skills and educational materials for unvaccinated clients. The primary outcome was first COVID-19 vaccination between December 1, 2021 and June 30, 2022 for clients of intervention CMs versus control CMs. Mixed method analysis included key informant interviews conducted from 5/24/22 to 7/25/22 with CMs, administrators, and clients about the PIV intervention. Results: Among 1939 clients of 78 study CMs, 528 (26.8 %) were unvaccinated by December 1, 2021 (274 clients of intervention CMs; 254 clients of control CMs). These clients' mean age was 62.3 years old (SD = 22.4) and 54 % were Black or Hispanic/Latino. First vaccination rate did not differ for intervention and control groups (6.2 % vs. 5.9 %, p = .89) by 6/30/2022. Barriers to addressing COVID-19 vaccination from interviews with 7 CMs and administrators were competing responsibilities and potentially antagonizing clients. Seven interviewed clients (five vaccinated and two unvaccinated) cited concerns about vaccination they heard from their family/friends and belief that risks of COVID-19 infection may be less than vaccination. Yet, some clients were receptive to physician recommendations. Conclusion: Training CMs to promote COVID-19 vaccination for disabled clients did not increase first vaccination rates. CMs preferred their usual role of coordinating care and, even after the training, expressed discomfort with this potentially polarizing topic.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文